Thinking
By Ajahn Amaro
Part One
Understanding And Relating To Thought
In Buddhist meditation circles conceptual thought tends to get the same rap
as the ego. It is perceived as something bad, something that we don't want or
that needs to be eliminated. And it's no wonder. Thinking can feel like a great
burden. In our efforts to meditate we see how unruly the mind can be. It charges
off here and there and everywhere chattering away insanely -- all day and night.
And because the mind can be so hyperactive we tend to make thoughts the enemy.
Meditation practice becomes a battleground between me, the meditator, and the
invading thoughts.
We tend to forget that in our schooling -- particularly in the West -- we spend
twelve, sixteen, eighteen and more years in education systems learning to think
and think and think, to create concepts, to juggle many ideas at once, to compare
them and critique them. And we get praised for our ability to do that well.
So it is hardly surprising that when we come to meditation all of this is still
going on. When we sit down to meditate we see the results of the actions of
a lifetime. That's to be expected. We can't decide to stop thinking any more
than we can decide to grow a couple of inches, keep our hair from graying, determine
to be a bit more charming, or never get angry again. We can do all the deciding
we like but it doesn't work.
Like many of us, I got interested in meditation to stop thinking. I wanted some
peace of mind! I had spent many years endlessly stimulating the mind with all
sorts of fascinating, useful, wonderful and interesting things and I felt immensely
burdened by the resulting mental activity. I wanted to at least slow it down
a bit if not stop it altogether.
Well, one day, after I had been living in the monastery for a little more than
a year, I finally got my wish. It had been our custom at the monastery to do
all-night meditation vigils. As you might imagine the body can get very stiff
and achy from these long hours of sitting and it was customary to fire up the
sauna the day after to soothe the stiffness and aching. (This may sound like
a luxury but it is actually a tradition from the time of the Buddha. Most monasteries
had a firehouse, a chantagara. This was seen as medicine to be used to benefit
people's health, to soothe aching muscles and bones.) Well, I was a novice at
the time and part of my job was to get the sauna ready -- to stack the firewood
and set up the water jars. Once I got it fired up, it was my habit to sit in
the sauna before everyone else arrived. Then, after everyone left, I'd putter
around a bit and sit in it again before I cleaned up.
On this particular occasion, I stayed on to sit a little longer after everyone
else had left. It was around 9:00PM in the evening and I had been awake for
thirty-six hours. The sauna was completely dark except for a little lamp in
the window, which was giving off a dim light. I had been sitting there for a
couple of hours when suddenly, without any warning, the thinking stopped. I
couldn't believe it! The thinking stopped completely. This was the first time
in my life that my mind had ever ceased thinking! "Wow," I said. "This
is what the mind feels like when it stops thinking. It is possible."
I was very excited! Granted I had to be driven to a state of complete exhaustion
in order to get that effect, but that was okay. The thinking had finally stopped.
As time went by, however, I noticed that the mind began to slow down quite naturally.
I didn't need one-hundred and eighty degree heat and fatigue for the thinking
to subside. And as my fascination with stopping the mind began to wear off I
noticed something even more interesting: Even though the mind was slowing down,
even though I would have periods when the mind was not thinking at all, I noticed
that it never actually stopped suffering! Even though the mind slows down and
stops thinking it is not necessarily free of dukkha. Whether that was dukkha
or not was independent of the presence or absence of that thinking. It is just
a mind with no thinking in it. This was a big disappointment!
I had to conclude that the act of thinking itself was not the problem. Rather
the suffering lay in the uncontrolled quality of thinking where the mind is
running and racing and just chattering away. And I suddenly became very interested
in how this random chatter occurred.
Papanca, The Thinking Mind Run Amok
First, it isn't the case that the mind is inherently thinking all the time.
Rather, thinking is a highly conditioned activity. In the teachings the process
is described in this way: We come into contact with things -- objects in the
world or our own thoughts. Each moment of such contact is accompanied by feeling
which is pleasant, painful, or neither. Whatever is being cognized is then named.
The Pali word for this is sañña. Most often it is translated as
perception but the English word "sign" comes from the same root as
sañña. Sañña is a kind of designation. There is
a raw sensing of a stimulus and then our memory moves in and names it. "That
is the sound of a dog barking."
Conceptual thought begins to cluster around that naming. That is, that which
we name, we then think about. This is called vitakka. We may think, "I
wonder who owns that dog." "Is that the same dog I saw yesterday?"
Then vitakka takes off. It blossoms into what is known as papanca. This is conceptual
proliferation. It is the mass of thoughts and conceptions, which burden the
heart and mind.
In this process there is a simple raw feeling, sensation or thought. There is
no particular feeling of self or other with that. But as the process takes off,
as the naming takes place, we begin to get a sense of me in here experiencing
the sound of that dog out there. As the thinking (vitakka) kicks in, the sense
of self and other becomes more concrete and the sense of me not only experiencing
this but also being burdened by it becomes more and more solid.
As meditators I am sure you have seen this pattern. With practice we start to
recognize this pattern. We see how it works.
Usually we are caught up in the activity of mental proliferation -- half way
through our great novel or fully through the saga of how our first marriage
could have been "if only . . ." -- before we wake up and remember
that it all started with the sound of the dog barking. "That sound reminded
me of Binker, our dog. We got the dog when we first got married. Maybe if we
hadn't had the dog the marriage would have worked out." Then we track it
back and see where it began.
As meditators we see how this pattern occurs over and over again. The mind's
propensity is to think habitually. It takes almost nothing to trigger it off.
For example, I spent most of my youth listening to rock music at every opportunity.
So when I entered the monastery in Thailand, I spent the first few years singing
inside my head. My mind was so used to listening to music that for the first
few years everything that happened at the monastery was a cue for a song. It
could be a leaf falling off a tree or a car going by. It could be the clanking
of a kerosene tin or comments that people made. It could even be just the random
thoughts in my mind. Any one event, word or thought could translate into a lyric.
It was like a Bing Crosby and Bob Hope movie. Before you know it you are playing
the entire soundtrack. I was staggered by the amount that the mind remembers
and conjures up!
That is the mind's habitual mode. It picks things up, chews on them and keeps
creating -- all from a moment's stimulation.
What's A Meditator To Do?
We can approach thought by trying to dissolve it. If there's enough wisdom in
our response to thinking we can simply say, "This is just a thought. It's
not me or mine," and we can cut thinking off as if with the sword of Manjushri.
But if there's not enough wisdom this can easily turn into an aggressive process.
We may believe that thought is an infection, a kind of nasty fungal growth that
is occupying the space between our ears. We can think that we need to wipe it
out. Or it can become suppressive. As Westerners, along with our great capacity
to think, we have tremendous willpower and we can use this to push thought down,
to hold it back. And this can be effective for a certain amount of time. But
when the will wobbles, and it will, the dam breaks and we are overwhelmed with
conceptual thought again.
So for myself, I have learned that the best way to deal with excessive thinking
is to just listen to it, to listen to the mind. Listening is much more effective
than trying to stop thought or cut it off. When we listen there is a different
mode employed in the heart. Instead of trying to cut it off, we receive thought
without making anything out of it.
During one of the monastic retreats at Amaravati Buddhist Monastery in England,
Ajahn Sumedho said emphatically, "All your thoughts are garbage. You may
think that some of them are good but you should consider the possibility that
all your thoughts are garbage." Some people may have felt that this was
an insulting thing to say, but I found it brought a tremendous sense of relief.
One of the biggest problems with thoughts is that we tend to believe everything
they say: "If I am thinking it, it must be true." But actually our
thoughts are just a collection of habitual judgments, perceptions, memories
and ideas that are fed through consciousness. They may have some relationship
with truth but they may not! If we take as a base line the notion that most
of our thoughts are like the random barking of the dog, we make less out of
them. And therein lies the sense of relief. We then find that we can relate
to thought in a much more open way. We are not looking on it as being meaningful
or true or realistic at all; and we're not giving it a value beyond what it
really has.
Most of our thoughts are like dreams. Occasionally, perhaps once or twice a
year we may have a dream that is significant and we know it. We may not know
exactly what it is about but it is pretty clear that there's a message in it.
But the other 364 days a year it's just the leftovers of the day. There is nothing
particularly significant or important about any of our dream content at all.
It's just the residue, the echoes of the day's events and activities, the things
that we have rehashed a couple of times already.
When we look at thought in this way we aren't being pulled into it. We can just
look at it. We don't reject it or suppress it, but we don't buy into it either.
We don't make more out of it than is there. That attitude of listening, of opening
to and receiving thought, has a liberating quality in-and-of itself.
Listening To The Sounds Of The World
In the Mahayana Buddhist tradition, along with Manjushri, one of the principle
bodhisattvas is Avalokiteshvara, "the one who listens to the sounds of
the world." Just as Manjushri is the embodiment of wisdom and the cutting
of the sword, so Avalokiteshvara is the embodiment of compassion. Just as Manjushri
is related to seeing, the seeing of light, enlightenment, so Avalokiteshvara
is related to hearing. Wisdom has a masculine, assertive quality; compassion,
listening, has a feminine receptive quality. (Even though Avalokiteshvara started
out as a masculine figure, it has been transmuted over the years. Most people
see it as feminine precisely because of this receptive, undiscriminating, openhearted
quality.)
There is a Chinese sutra in which the Buddha asked all the bodhisattvas their
method for realizing enlightenment. Each one described a specific meditation
practice. Avalokiteshvara described meditation on hearing. She said she starts
her meditation by listening to the sound of the roar of the sea. Then she takes
that sound and turns it inward. She returns the hearing to listen to the ear
organ. By doing this she realizes the true way.
Some years ago Ajahn Sumedho was teaching a retreat at a Chinese monastery in
California. For years the people at this monastery were puzzling over this phrase,
"returning the hearing to listen to the ear organ." They couldn't
figure out what that meant. Now, Ajahn Sumedho had been teaching a meditation
on the sound of silence, the nada sound. Suddenly the people at the monastery
realized this must be what he was teaching, this active inner listening. Listening
to the inner sound brings the heart into a position of acute inner awareness.
It is not that the inner sound has some magical property. Rather, it is that
bringing of the alert mind, bringing openness and receptivity to sound, is symbolic
of the presence of ultimate truth. The sound is always there. We don't have
to create it. It is featureless. It is ever present. So it is a good symbol
for Ultimate Reality itself.
In the sutra the Buddha praised this method, the meditation on listening, as
the best method for enlightenment. Ajahn Sumedho had been teaching the meditation
on the nada sound for some years so he was tickled by this connection to another
Buddhist tradition. He hadn't realized that there had been so much emphasis
on this in traditional Buddhist meditation practices.
I tend to prefer this meditation object over the breath because I have found
that the quality of listening translates very well from being a meditation object
to being a mental attitude of listening -- listening to thought, listening to
the world around me. There is a quality of acceptance, nondiscrimination, compassion.
Thought can be there but we can treat it in the same way as we treat a feeling
in the body or a sound that we hear or a smell or a taste. Thought is just a
sense object perceived by the mind. Just as a sound is perceived by the ear
or as light is perceived by the eye, so thought is perceived by the mind. Just
as we can be completely lost in something that we hear or feel or see or taste
or touch, so we can be lost in thought. But just as we can be mindful of these,
so, too it is with thinking. Just as the mind can be absorbed in thought and
carried away by it, so too, it can be clearly aware of thought and unconfused
by it. The thoughts actually decorate the silence of the mind.
When it is seen in its proper perspective, thought is seen as just another sense
object. Just as we can be totally at peace with seeing or hearing or feeling,
so, too, we can be at peace with thought. If we understand it in the right way
it is possible to have thought in the mind and have no obstruction whatsoever
to our natural peace and happiness.
Thinking Is Not A Problem
So it doesn't matter if there is thought in the mind or not. This is not the
issue. What matters is the way we relate to it. This makes the difference. When
we have the right attitude, right view, we are able to establish a quality of
knowing, of awareness. As feelings appear, as sights and sounds and memories
and thoughts and ideas come and go, we see that we don't have to do anything
about them. We don't have to push them away. We don't have to hang on to them.
We needn't be intimidated by them. We don't have to get drunk on them. They
just are what they are.
Even though it is pleasant for the mind to get calm and not think, we shouldn't
praise that as the be-all and end-all. The mind can be in a state of not-thinking
and this may not necessarily be a liberated state. You could take thorazine
or have a lobotomy and you wouldn't be thinking. If that was the way to Nibbána
then the Buddha would have recommended it. We could just mix a few herbs together,
make a potion, take a few cupfuls, and everything would be fine. But it's not
a matter of not thinking. Not-thinking is not synonymous with liberation. We
can close our eyes and block our ears and not sense anything but that does not
mean we are liberated. It just means that the screen is blank. It is not an
exalted state at all. It's more like watching TV with a blank screen. We may
criticize American TV but it's better than watching a blank screen!
To be able to control thought, to be able to think when you want to think and
refrain from thinking when you want to refrain, is an extremely handy skill
to possess. I'll grant that. But it is crucial that we don't judge our meditation
on the basis of whether or not we can stop thinking. It is important to look
at thought in a new way. I've been describing the quality of listening to the
mind, of looking at what is going on in the mind with an openhearted awareness,
and inviting you to not be too particular about the object of awareness. It
is important that you put as much emphasis -- more emphasis! -- on the nature
of the subject, the one who is knowing. This is what will get you free.
Part Two
Investigation, The Use Of Reflective Thought
Investigation or reflective thought can be a very helpful tool in spiritual
practice. This is something that is not often talked about. Thought is generally
looked upon as an intruder in the mind. But if you look at the Buddha's teachings
you see that over and over again the Buddha described the use of reflective
thought as a tool: "Wisely reflecting one considers thus . . ." On
the night of the Buddha's enlightenment he was reflecting on causality, on dependent
origination. This kind of reflection involves the skillful use of thought, not
the avoidance of it.
Investigation refers to the quality of mind, a natural intelligence, which recognizes
patterns. It is the quality of mind, which discerns order, which looks into
things and determines what is going on, what is the nature of the experience.
It is an innate function of the mind.
Investigation figures strongly in the Buddhist teachings. The term shows up
in a number of places. Dhamma-Vijaya, for example, means "investigation
of reality," and it is one of the seven factors of enlightenment. Yoniso-manasika-ra
is another term, which appears often. It means, "going to the root of things"
or "paying attention to the source." It is sometimes called wise consideration
or wise reflection. Both of these are highly valued and encouraged in the Buddha's
teachings and practices.
When you realize the importance of investigation in the Buddhist teachings,
you can no longer see thought as an intrusion or a corruption. Thought is a
natural occurrence in the mind and investigation, a natural aptitude. It is
a function of awareness. Investigation is a discerning of the relatedness of
different elements in our experiential field.
There are two ways to use investigation -- applied to a specific theme, for
example, if there is something that mystifies you or is a big issue in your
life, or applied as things come up on their own.
Investigating A Specific Theme
We usually think, "Now that I am meditating I have to switch off the thinking.
But actually during meditation is the best time to do our thinking. If there
is something that you want to investigate, sit down, relax the body, center
the mind, and deliberately bring that into awareness.
One way to use this approach, for example, is to ask about a specific theme
that you want to understand. "What is selflessness?" or "What
does death mean to me?" or "How do I relate to the idea of my own
death?" Ajahn Chah said that three times a day (morning, midday, and evening)
we should ask ourselves the question, "Why was I born?" When the mind
is steady and clear you can use this kind of inquiry. This is a fertile environment.
You might use investigation to understand an aspect or subject of the teachings.
"How does desire lead to grasping? How does feeling turn into grasping?"
Or you might ask, "When I use the word ignorance, what is that? What is
ignorance?" Then consult your own wisdom. Don't try to enter into a logical
process but rather wait and see what arises in response to that question. Pursue
the questioning in this fashion. Thus, while there is thinking going on, it
is happening within a spacious medium.
Now, if the mind races off and starts chattering, then come back, relax, and
realize that the issue is too charged. You will need to establish more tranquility
and concentration before going back into it.
There is no end to the usefulness of this manner of investigation. Sometimes
if I have to take part in a conference, or someone has asked for a Dhamma talk
with a particular theme, I'll sit myself down with a legal pad and pen, write
the title of the talk or workshop on the top of the page, close my eyes, and
repeat the topic to myself. It might be something like: "The Dhamma and
Nature", or "The Buddhist Attitude Towards Death and Dying."
It doesn't matter. I just repeat the topic and see what comes up. Then I take
notes and jot it down.
You can also look at something more mundane, some aspect of your life. Perhaps
you are madly in love with someone or you are trying to break up with someone.
Perhaps you are having a conflict with your parents or boss or friend. The idea
is to consciously bring that up. Establish your focus. And then state what is
going on in your life, and witness what arises: What is going along with that
/ What is contributing to that / What effect does it have?
One of the most useful aspects of reflective thought is to understand the assumptions
we have about identity, the feeling of self. We can start with a statement such
as, "Who am I?" Thus our habitual assumptions about who we are become
challenged. They are punctured. There is a moment where the questioning itself
changes things. It is like turning the camera onto the photographer. The sense
of self is startled. It trips over its own feet. For a moment the self-creation
mechanism is interrupted. In that moment there is a gap. The mind is awake.
There is clarity, but no sense of self.
When using this method of investigation the thinking mind will wade in with
verbal answers but we are explicitly not interested in these. We want to create
an interruption in the flow of self-creation. So that if the mind comes back
with answers, we don't stop there. We keep the questioning open-ended. We keep
reflecting. We keep challenging the conceptual answers that the conceptual mind
gives. We have to repeatedly use different angles to get out of making habitual
responses. When a hesitation or gap occurs, just let yourself rest in that.
Keep going back to that. Keep looking to see what it is.
This is using the mind when it is settled in it's most relaxed and intelligent
state. More often than not you will find associations, ideas, images that wouldn't
normally occur to you. This is because you are not driving the thought towards
some kind of logical conclusion. You are not looking for answers. Rather you
are simply open to receiving jewels.
In the silence of the mind lies the answer to all questions. At that moment
there is the recognition of the reality of all things. We see life in its essence.
Thus, reflective thought is a very useful tool to recognize the nature of mind,
which is so easily obscured by the patterns of our conditioning. It is ironic
that it is actually the use of thought, which can bring about this most clarifying
of insights.
When Things Come Up On Their Own
The other method is to apply investigation when things naturally pop into the
mind. Using this method we process things in that same reflective manner. Ajahn
Chah used this a lot. He had an inner analysis going on much of the time. When
something came up he would think about it, contemplate it like this. He would
have internal dialogues, very actively using thought to explore. He'd ask, "Why
is this? What does it say about that?"
We can employ this method throughout the course of the day. When on retreat,
for example, you might come into the hall and find that someone has moved your
cushion and you may notice a strong emotional reaction -- outrage or irritation.
So you can reflect on that. "Isn't that interesting? I see this space as
my patch and I am defending my territory. It's as if my territory has been invaded.
A week ago this was not mine. Last week it belonged to the retreat center. Now
I call it mine and I want to kill the person who invades my space! Here I am
contemplating homicide. Isn't that interesting?"
Similarly, if you find that you are critical of yourself, you can look at it.
If you notice that you are twitching like an ant on a hot plate, and you notice
that the person next to you hasn't moved all week, that he or she is sitting
there all noble and serene, never blinking, totally composed and restrained
. . . and if this causes you to think of yourself as a vibrating intrusion on
the universe . . . this can be contemplated. We judge ourselves against our
neighbors and with investigation we can see and understand this. If you want
to help the investigation along you can even take the issue to absurdity. "I
am the most agitated person on the universe. Everyone else is in eighth jhana.
They are all arahants but me. I am just an infection that has been sent along
to try the patience of these noble and holy beings." Thus, you begin to
see how absurd it is.
The idea here is to take the habitual reactions and judgments and open them
up. We look into what we want, what we fear, what we dislike. We look into the
compulsive reactions and opinions, the way we judge people. This is all within
the realm of meditation.
One might imagine that the sitting posture or the walking posture is some kind
of sacred space that no thought should be allowed into. No visas will be issued.
But the time when we are meditating is exactly the best time to use investigation
and reflective thought. It is when the mind is as its most sharp and clear.
This is when you can get the deepest results!
When I first went into the monastery I used to use this kind of reflection to
shed light on my relationship with my mother. I have a wonderful mother but
we've had a somewhat fraught relationship -- particularly when I went off to
the Far East and became a Buddhist monk without any warning. I'd get tense letters
from England on a regular basis. So I'd sit quietly in my kuti and I'd think
the word "mother." I'd watch what followed, the volcano erupting like
Mt. St. Helens. And I'd witness the patterns of reactivity. Then I'd establish
a sense of calm again and, some time after, drop it in once more.
Now the issue, or question at-hand, doesn't have to be emotionally charged.
We can investigate anything. This kind of reflective thought has an entirely
different quality than papanca. You can use it to watch papanca, but it is more
usefully engaged in as a way of investigating the teachings or our patterns
or habits of thought. "What are the teachings about? Why do I react to
things in the way I do? Why am I shy? Why do I get over-enthusiastic and excited?
What is behind that?" We put a question forward and listen for a response.
So try this and see what comes up. Some thought or intuition will probably arise.
"Well, I do that to fill up the space. I meet someone new and I am afraid
that they are going to reject me so I swamp them with interesting things to
say." You might ask, "What am I afraid of?" Maybe nothing in
particular will arise. You may not know what it is. You may feel a sense of
fear and not know what it is. Sometime later you can pick it up and look at
it. You may notice yourself doing that particular thing in daily life and then
you'll notice, "Ah, I'm doing it again." Just setting the intention
to look at it will make it more apparent and gradually you'll begin to see into
it. It might take years but that's okay. Be patient.
Stay Open To All Possibilities
In using thought in this way we are not demanding a fixed or certain answer.
We must remain open to any possibility. If something arises, fine. If nothing
arises, fine. You are consulting the oracle of your own heart because that is
what knows. In our hearts there is a well of infinite wealth and wisdom. We
are using that turning to that. When the papanca gets running we can let it
go and then come back to this place of investigation.
When we handle things with this ease we are changing the way we usually relate.
The mind wants to know everything. Even if it doesn't understand, it will have
some belief. It will form an opinion or view and hang on to that just to fill
up the space of not knowing. It wants to be on top of things. But this whole
method of investigation and inquiry depends upon not knowing. It depends upon
us being open and ready to not know. It depends upon us allowing mystery and
letting the knowing arise out of that. It depends on our not being threatened.
From the ego's point of view, the unknown is frightening. It is threatening
and it responds to that threat by clinging to a belief as a way of dispelling
it. But from the point of view of the heart, the unconditioned mind, the unknown
is mysterious . . . but it is beautiful. You don't have to fill up the unknown
with a belief or a concept or idea. You can leave it as mysterious because 99%
of it will be mysterious anyway. There is no way that we can understand it all.
So the heart's response to that mystery is faith - a trust in the fundamental
orderliness of the universe.
Investigate All The Time
Using these methods we learn that even though thinking might be going on it
is not irritating, not an intrusion or invasion. Thinking is happening within
the context of pure awareness.
When we are outside of retreat time and having to deal with more complexities
of perception, when we have bigger decisions to make than how many bowls of
cereal to eat, when you have to look after your family, when we have to deal
with intense emotions and projections and perform as personalities, etc. then
developing this quality of reflection/investigation is incredibly useful. It
becomes a way of sustaining mindfulness.
If you think mindfulness involves labeling what comes up and doing everything
in a very deliberate fashion, you will suffer enormously because the world is
not under your control. If you feel that in order to be mindful you have to
have a sterilized environment like on retreat, you put yourself in a very weakened
position. And you misunderstand mindfulness.
Mindfulness is a mind that is full. It is not a particular attention to detail.
When the mind is full of the present, the moment, this mind-full-ness is what
we are aiming for. When it is full it is full of wisdom.
Developing the quality of investigation is a way of keeping track, of being
tuned in to what is going on inside of us -- the mood, the flow of feeling.
Some people leave the retreat and then go into Safeway, for example, and become
paralyzed by all the stimulation. But this can be investigated. You can realize
that this is the experience of being hit by Safeway. "It's like this when
the mind is hit by color and choices. This is the feeling of being overwhelmed."
Thus you are picking up and processing, digesting, using the thinking faculty
to notice what is going on. "This is agitation. This is the frenzy of over-stimulation.
I'm in Safeway and this is what that feels like." It's ordinary. It is
not necessarily an intrusion.
When you sit, you sit with the resonance of the day. If you keep ringing the
bell all day there will be resonance. We sit to meditate and expect that there
will be stillness. But, big surprise, we see the after-effects of the day. A
few well-placed reflections can save you weeks of grief. You think, "Oh
this is terrible. I can't meditate. I've got to go into the forest, off to the
mountains." We keep holding that experience as indicating something is
wrong with our practice. But there is nothing wrong with our practice. If you
experience a lot of agitation and noise during the day, when you sit, there
it is. You don't have to argue with it or fight against it. Just by reflecting
we see that it is the natural effect of certain causes and we find peace in
relation to it. We are not looking for peace in the absence of perception, emotion
or moods. Peace is found in the attitude that we have towards it. Then you find
that there can be an immense buzz or noise going on and there is peace in the
heart. That is freedom. It's not in wiping out all the experiences.
When we want to hold a retreat we don't hold it in the freeway. We find a quiet
place. But if we think this is the only way we can be peaceful -- to do a ten
day retreat, and that the rest is just being a wage-slave to save up enough
money to go do the next retreat -- then we have really wasted the opportunity.
We haven't learned anything useful. We have turned the quietude of the retreat
into a very dependent refuge. Certainly, it is better to have that kind of refuge
than none at all. But if we set that up in our minds then we are not making
full use of what Buddha-Dhamma can provide.
Retreat is like five-finger exercises. You run the scales over and over again
so that when it comes time to improvise, to get out there and play, your fingers
know where to go. You don't have to think about it. The point of the exercises
is not to perfect the running of scales. You may become very good at scales,
but the point of the scales is to be able to produce music. That's how to properly
see retreat time. The point is to learn skills that can help us along in the
flow of the experience of living, in the rest of our lives. The retreat is not
the real thing. Try not to set that up in your mind. This won't help you at
all.
No matter whether we are in retreat or outside, whether we have to be in charge
or submissive, if we have to take responsibility or get out of the way, the
heart knows this is the way to respond. The usefulness of this practice is in
discovering that quality of response and trusting it. We are learning a responsiveness
to each situation. Then we use the props like keeping the Precepts, investigation,
mindfulness of the body, etc. to support that basic process of attending, opening
the heart to the present moment, and letting ourselves respond from a place
of naturalness, simplicity and an unbiased heart.