A life-affirming
Buddhism that teaches us to find happiness by opening to the richness of our everyday
lives.
That's what we want -- or so we're told by the people who try to sell
us a mainstreamlined Buddhism. But is it what we need? And is it Buddhism?
Think back for a moment on the story of the young Prince Siddhartha and his first
encounters with aging, illness, death, and a wandering contemplative. It's one
of the most accessible chapters in the Buddhist tradition, largely because of
the direct, true-to-the-heart quality of the young prince's emotions. He saw aging,
illness, and death as an absolute terror, and pinned all his hopes on the contemplative
forest life as his only escape. As Asvaghosa, the great Buddhist poet, depicts
the story, the young prince had no lack of friends and family members who tried
to talk him out of those perceptions, and Asvaghosa was wise enough to show their
life-affirming advice in a very appealing light. Still, the prince realized that
if he were to give in to their advice, he would be betraying his heart. Only by
remaining true to his honest emotions was he able to embark on the path that led
away from the ordinary values of his society and toward an unsurpassed Awakening
into the Deathless.
This is hardly a life-affirming story in the ordinary
sense of the term, but it does affirm something more important than life: the
truth of the heart when it aspires to a happiness absolutely pure. The power of
this aspiration depends on two emotions, called in Pali samvega and pasada. Very
few of us have heard of them, but they're the emotions most basic to the Buddhist
tradition. Not only did they inspire the young prince in his quest for Awakening,
but even after he became the Buddha he advised his followers to cultivate them
on a daily basis. In fact, the way he handled these emotions is so distinctive
that it may be one of the most important contributions his teachings have to offer
to American culture today.
Samvega was what the young Prince Siddhartha felt
on his first exposure to aging, illness, and death. It's a hard word to translate
because it covers such a complex range -- at least three clusters of feelings
at once: the oppressive sense of shock, dismay, and alienation that come with
realizing the futility and meaninglessness of life as it's normally lived; a chastening
sense of our own complacency and foolishness in having let ourselves live so blindly;
and an anxious sense of urgency in trying to find a way out of the meaningless
cycle. This is a cluster of feelings we've all experienced at one time or another
in the process of growing up, but I don't know of a single English term that adequately
covers all three. It would be useful to have such a term, and maybe that's reason
enough for simply adopting the word samvega into our language.
But more than
providing a useful term, Buddhism also offers an effective strategy for dealing
with the feelings behind it -- feelings that our own culture finds threatening
and handles very poorly. Ours, of course, is not the only culture threatened by
feelings of samvega. In the Siddhartha story, the father's reaction to the young
prince's discovery stands for the way most cultures try to deal with these feelings:
He tried to convince the prince that his standards for happiness were impossibly
high, at the same time trying to distract him with relationships and every sensual
pleasure imaginable. To put it simply, the strategy was to get the prince to lower
his aims and to find satisfaction in a happiness that was less than absolute and
not especially pure.
If the young prince were living in America today, the
father would have other tools for dealing with the prince's dissatisfaction, but
the basic strategy would be essentially the same. We can easily imagine him taking
the prince to a religious counselor who would teach him to believe that God's
creation is basically good and not to focus on any aspects of life that would
cast doubt on that belief. Or he might take him to a psychotherapist who would
treat feelings of samvega as an inability to accept reality. If talking therapies
didn't get results, the therapist would probably prescribe mood-altering drugs
to dull the feeling out of the young man's system so that he could become a productive,
well-adjusted member of society.
If the father were really up on current
trends, he might find a Dharma teacher who would counsel the prince to find happiness
in life's little miraculous pleasures -- a cup of tea, a walk in the woods, social
activism, easing another person's pain. Never mind that these forms of happiness
would still be cut short by aging, illness, and death, he would be told. The present
moment is all we have, so we should try to appreciate the bittersweet opportunity
of relishing but not holding on to brief joys as they pass.
It's unlikely
that the lion-hearted prince we know from the story would take to any of this
well-meant advice. He'd see it as propaganda for a life of quiet desperation,
asking him to be a traitor to his heart. But if he found no solace from these
sources, where in our society would he go? Unlike the India of his time, we don't
have any well-established, socially accepted alternatives to being economically
productive members of society. Even our contemplative religious orders are prized
for their ability to provide bread, honey, and wine for the marketplace. So the
prince would probably find no alternative but to join the drifters and dropouts,
the radicals and revolutionaries, the subsistence hunters and survivalists consigned
to the social fringe.
He'd discover many fine minds and sensitive spirits
in these groups, but no accumulated body of proven and profound alternative wisdom
to draw on. Someone might give him a book by Thoreau or Muir, but their writings
would offer him no satisfactory analysis of aging, illness, and death, and no
recommendations for how to go beyond them. And because there's hardly any safety
net for people on the fringe, he'd find himself putting an inordinate amount of
his energy into issues of basic survival, with little time or energy left over
to find his own solution to the problem of samvega. He would end up disappearing,
his Buddhahood aborted -- perhaps in the Utah canyon country, perhaps in a Yukon
forest -- without trace.
Fortunately for us, however, the prince was born
in a society that did provide support and respect for its dropouts. This was what
gave him the opportunity to find a solution to the problem of samvega that did
justice to the truths of his heart.
The first step in that solution is symbolized
in the Siddhartha story by the prince's reaction to the fourth person he saw on
his travels outside of the palace: the wandering forest contemplative. The emotion
he felt at this point is termed pasada, another complex set of feelings usually
translated as "clarity and serene confidence." It's what keeps samvega
from turning into despair. In the prince's case, he gained a clear sense of his
predicament and of the way out of it, leading to something beyond aging, illness,
and death, at the same time feeling confident that the way would work.
As
the early Buddhist teachings freely admit, the predicament is that the cycle of
birth, aging, and death is meaningless. They don't try to deny this fact and so
don't ask us to be dishonest with ourselves or to close our eyes to reality. As
one teacher has put it, the Buddhist recognition of the reality of suffering --
so important that suffering is honored as the first noble truth -- is a gift,
in that it confirms our most sensitive and direct experience of things, an experience
that many other traditions try to deny.
From there, the early teachings ask
us to become even more sensitive, to the point where we see that the true cause
of suffering is not out there -- in society or some outside being -- but in here,
in the craving present in each individual mind. They then confirm that there is
an end to suffering, a release from the cycle. And they show the way to that release,
through developing noble qualities already latent in the mind to the point where
they cast craving aside and open onto Deathlessness. Thus the predicament has
a practical solution, a solution within the powers of every human being.
It's also a solution open to critical scrutiny and testing -- an indication of
how confident the Buddha was in the solution he found to the problem of samvega.
This is one of the aspects of authentic Buddhism that most attracts people who
are tired of being told that they should try to deny the insights that inspired
their sense of samvega in the first place.
In fact, early Buddhism is not
only confident that it can handle feelings of samvega but it's also one of the
few religions that actively cultivates them to a radical extent. Its solution
to the problems of life demand so much dedicated effort that only strong samvega
will keep the practicing Buddhist from slipping back into his or her old ways.
Hence the recommendation that all Buddhists, both men and women, lay or ordained,
should reflect daily on the facts of aging, illness, separation, and death --
to develop feelings of samvega -- and on the power of one's own actions, to take
samvega one step further, to pasada.
For people whose sense of samvega is
so strong that they want to abandon any social ties that prevent them from following
the path to the end of suffering, Buddhism offers both a long-proven body of wisdom
for them to draw from, as well as a safety net: the monastic sangha, an institution
that enables them to leave lay society without having to waste time worrying about
basic survival. For those who can't leave their social ties, Buddhist teaching
offers a way to live in the world without being overcome by the world, following
a life of generosity, virtue, and meditation to strengthen the noble qualities
of the mind that will lead to the end of suffering.
The symbiotic relationship
designed for these two branches of the Buddhist parisa, or community, guarantees
that each will benefit from contact with the other. The support of the laity guarantees
that the monastics will not need to be overly concerned about food, clothing,
and shelter; the gratitude that the monastics inevitably feel for the freely-offered
generosity of the laity helps to keep them from turning into misfits and misanthropes.
At the same time, contact with the monastics helps the laity foster the proper
perspective on life that nurtures the energy of samvega and pasada they need to
keep from becoming dulled and numbed by the materialistic propaganda of the mainstream
economy.
So the Buddhist attitude toward life cultivates samvega -- a clear
acceptance of the meaninglessness of the cycle of birth, aging, and death -- and
develops it into pasada: a confident path to the Deathless. That path includes
not only time-proven guidance, but also a social institution that nurtures it
and keeps it alive. These are all things that our society desperately needs. It's
a shame that, in our current efforts at mainstreaming Buddhism, they are aspects
of the Buddhist tradition usually ignored. We keep forgetting that one source
of Buddhism's strength is its ability to keep one foot out of the mainstream,
and that the traditional metaphor for the practice is that it crosses over the
stream to the further shore. My hope is that we will begin calling these things
to mind and taking them to heart, so that in our drive to find a Buddhism that
sells, we don't end up selling ourselves short.
***********************************************************************************************
A
Buddhist Nun in High School
by Venerable Thubten Chodron©
The high school students wrote and performed the play themselves. Their teacher
had invited me to watch it and to give a talk at the school assembly. The plot
goes thus: God is sitting in heaven, reading a newspaper while the angels peacefully
play Chinese checkers. Devils sneak in, and mischievously incite the angels to
quibble and accuse each other of cheating. Pandemonium breaks out in heaven.
"Stop
this!!" shouts God. "I won't have any of this business in heaven! This
conflict must be the work of the earthlings.
Angel Peace, go to Earth and
see what's going on. Find out why the humans there aren't peaceful."Angel
Peace flies to Earth where he organizes a World Peace Conference. The delegates,
students from the U.K., Israel, India, Korea, U.S.A., Hong Kong and other countries,
tell the woes of their nations - violence, poverty, human suffering.
"There
must be something to do about this," exclaims Angel Peace. "Today we
have a guest speaker to talk about peace."The teacher nudges me and whispers,
"That's your cue." Getting up from my seat in the audience, I go on
the stage. "Hello students cum delegates at the World Peace Conference. When
I was in my teens, I began to ask questions that perhaps you have too: Why do
people fight if everyone wants peace? Why is there racial discrimination?
"We
always blame our problems on someone or something external - another person, a
group of people, the society, the government, the "system." Other people
and external situations may be a circumstance for our problems, but if we look
closely, we can see that conflict really originates in the mind. It comes from
anger, jealousy, selfishness, greed, pride, closed-mindedness and other disturbing
attitudes. Our minds make the world unpeaceful, so if we want peace, we have to
change our own attitudes, and dispel negative emotions such as anger, greed and
so on. Governments can't legislate peace. It only comes when each of us takes
the responsibility to control his or her own mind, making it tolerant and peaceful.
"We
can develop patience and respect for others by understanding that on a deep level
we are all the same. Everyone wants to be happy and no one wants to have problems.
We have to look beyond people's superficial qualities - short, tall, handsome,
ugly, black, white, rich, poor, educated, illiterate. When we do this, we recognize
that in our hearts, we're all the same in that each of us wants happiness and
doesn't want suffering, although different people find happiness in different
ways. Thinking like this, we can develop respect for all living beings.
"Each
of us feels 'My happiness is more important than anyone else's.' But if we ask
ourselves, 'Why?' we can't find a good reason. Slowly, we can come to see that
we aren't the most important person in the world, that it is the selfish attitude
which propels us to aggressively seek our own happiness at the expense of others'
well-being. If we develop the awareness that all beings are equal and therefore
everyone's happiness is important, then automatically, we won't be so selfish.
We'll see that it's not essential to always get our own way. We can happily give
something up to make others happy, because their happiness is important. The happier
others are, the less problems they'll cause us. So by cherishing others, our own
lives will be free from outwards disturbances. In addition, we'll be happy knowing
that others are happy.
"We say that we want peace in the world, in our
families, but we often don't want to relinquish having our own way in order to
have peace, and instead we blame the other party for the problem. Peace won't
come that way. If will only come by genuinely wanting others to be happy and by
respecting their points of view.
"This attitude of cherishing others is
the root of world peace, and each of us has the ability and the responsibility
to develop it within ourselves. This is part of our human potential; this is the
beauty of being a human being. We can be wise and compassionate, but we must act
to develop these qualities. First, we can try to be aware of what we say and do
each day, and ask ourselves, 'Why am I doing this? Is it beneficial for myself
and others? Is a kind attitude or a selfish one motivating what I'm saying and
doing?' If we observe that our motivations or actions are destructive, then we
can correct them."
The students were listening intently. Afterwards,
many came to thank me. Several teachers asked me to come back and talk to their
classes.
Sometimes I spoke to over a thousand students in a school assembly.
But when I visited classrooms of twenty-five to thirty students, the format was
question-and-answer. In that way, the students told me what they wanted to know.
Many of their questions centered around my lifestyle as a Buddhist nun, and how
and why I came to make the decision to be ordained. From my side, no question
is too personal, because it's important that young people - and adults too - understand
why a person chooses a life style dedicated to self-discovery and to helping others
spiritually. Nor is any question stupid, for if a person sincerely wants to know
something, that question is meaningful to him or her, and therefore is an important
question.
They wanted to know what I do as a nun. What happens every day? Why
did I take vows instead of being a lay Buddhist? What did my family and friends
say? How have I changed since becoming a nun? Have I ever regretted this decision?
What happens if I break a vow? Some teenage girls asked me what I do when I see
a handsome man, and one nine-year old innocently asked if nuns got pregnant!
Many
questions concerned meditation. What is it? Why do it? How does it help in? In
some classes, the students wanted to meditate, so we did a short, simple, breathing
meditation. In one school, I led a weekly meditation class. The teachers commented
that they never saw their students so quiet.
They wondered who is Buddha? Do
I believe in God? One child asked if God ever spoke to me (she was disappointed
when I said "No.") They were very interested in rebirth and karma -
how our present actions influence our future experiences.
We discussed selfishness
and love. Is an action selfish if what a person does looks good on the outside
but his motivation is to get something for himself? What if a person's motivation
was altruistic but her actions didn't externally appear to be helping others at
that very moment? Was my motivation for becoming a nun selfish?
Older students
asked about the application of spiritual and ethical principles to politics and
social injustice. If anger is to be avoided, what can the blacks in South Africa
do to better their situation? What should be done with terrorists? What are the
advantages of non-violence? They had to think when I said that sometimes we must
act strongly, but with a mind free from anger. Being patient doesn't mean being
passive. Also, we have to develop compassion not only for the victims but also
for the aggressors.
They were surprised to hear that I appreciate other religions
more since I learned the Buddha's teachings. They expected me to say that my religion
is the best and everyone should be Buddhist. But I didn't. Instead I told them
it is good that many religions exist because people have different inclinations
and dispositions. With a plurality of religions in the world, people can find
an approach suitable for them. Any teaching that encourages people not to harm
others and to help and be kind to others - no matter what religious or philosophical
tradition it comes from - is a good teaching and we should follow that advice.
I continually stressed the need to respect other religions, and to look at the
meaning of a religious teachings, not just to get stuck in the words and think,
"I am this and you are that. Therefore, we can't get along." Such an
attitude leads to conflict and war.
It is invigorating to discuss things with
teenagers because they are direct and honest. They are examining new ideas and
at the same time clinging to old ones. But they're open and inquisitive, and I
was pleased just by the fact that my talks set them thinking. Inevitably, the
bell rang and time was up before the students ran out of questions.
I was also
impressed with the administrators and teachers of the English Schools Foundation,
because they wanted the students to be exposed to people from various walks of
life. They wanted people to talk to the students about world peace. This open-minded
attitude in the school system was so refreshing, and of course, the students benefited
from it.
How did the parents react to my visits to the schools? I met some
parents and they were pleased. "Children learn so much information in school,
but they aren't taught how to deal with their emotions or how to get along with
others. The schools don't teach our children how to be kind human beings. They
teach them how to make business and how to generate nuclear energy, but not how
to use these things properly," they said. "Your talks made them think
about how their actions influence others."
This raises a crucial question:
what is important to learn in school? Personally, I have always felt (and I was
a teacher before becoming a nun) that if children learn how to be good human beings
and how to be happy and get along with others, they still will learn other subjects
and will be happier to do so. Afterall, should we measure success in life by how
much we know and how much money we have, or by how happy we are and how well we
get along with others?
The nine-year olds wrote letters and drew pictures after
my visit. Here are some excerpts:
"Dear Chodron, thank you for coming
to talk about Buddhism. When you showed us how to meditate, my legs began to ache.
You said that when you started to meditate your legs ached too. I thought you
would be used to it because you do it most of the time. I really think you are
a nice nun. Thank you very much."
"It was very interesting. It was
the first time I ever saw a Buddhist nun. I thought you were the best nun I ever
saw. I think it is best not to kill animals."
"The world of Buddhism
is fascinating. I learned that if you are selfish and unkind, people will be unkind
back to you. So it is best to be kind. I liked your robes. They are very colorful."
"You don't grow your hair or wear make-up because you don't have to look
pretty on the outside, but you are nice on the inside."
***********************************************************************************************
Working
with Emotions
by Venerable Thubten Chodron©
People
worldwide want to know how to work with their emotions - how to prevent being
overwhelmed by painful ones and how to enrich the wholesome and loving ones. As
a young person, I had no idea how to do this, and it was Buddhism's perspective
on this that first attracted me. So I will begin with my journey leading to the
Buddha's teachings, continue with the methods the Buddha recommended to work with
emotions, and conclude with a few observations about the future of Buddhism.
I
came to Buddhism rather unexpectedly, or so it may seem. As a child, I was curious
about religion, and as a teenager, my mind teemed with spiritual questions: Why
am I alive? What is the purpose of life? What happens after death? Why do people
fight and kill each other if they want to live in peace? What does it mean to
love others? Growing up in a reform Jewish family in a predominantly Christian
suburb in the USA, I asked my teachers and the religious leaders around me. The
answers that satisfied them nevertheless left me dry.
Studying history at university,
I came to learn that almost every generation, for hundreds of years, wars were
fought in Europe in the name of God. Disillusionment with organized religion overcame
me, for wasn't religion supposed to make people more peaceful and harmonious?
In reaction, as a young person in the sixties, I took part in some of the social
protests of the times, as well as turned to the various distractions offered to
my generation.
I graduated Phi Beta Khapa from UCLA and after working for a
year, traveled in Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. I wanted to
learn about life through experiencing it instead of reading about it. After a
year and a half, I had learned a lot, but still lacked understanding of the meaning
of life. Nevertheless, feeling that the purpose of life must have to do with benefiting
others, I returned to the USA, taught elementary school in Los Angeles, and graduate
studies in Education at USC.
One summer vacation, I saw a flyer about a meditation
course taught by two Tibetan monks, Lama Thubten Yeshe and Zopa Rinpoche. One
of the first things they said at the course was, "You don't have to believe
anything we say. You are intelligent people. Listen to the teachings; think about
them logically; test them out in your own life experience. Use the teachings that
help you in your life and leave those that don't make sense on the back burner."
"Whew,"
I thought. "Now I'll listen." If they had said they would tell us the
Truth, I would have left. I liked Buddhism's open-minded approach and began to
listen and to practice the teachings. As I did, I was surprised to find that what
the Buddha taught over twenty-five centuries ago in ancient India applied to my
modern American life. I wanted to learn more.
During a retreat after the course,
I realized that if I neglected this opportunity to learn the Dharma - the Buddha's
teachings - I would regret it at the end of my life, and dying with regret never
appealed to me. Thus, instead of resuming my teaching post that autumn, I went
to Kopan Monastery, Lama and Rinpoche's monastery outside Kathmandu, Nepal. My
parents were hardly thrilled about their daughter once again putting on a backpack
to visit a third world country. But for me, the spiritual urge was strong, and
I had to follow it.
Once there I attended the teachings that the lamas gave
in broken English to the variety of Western travelers passing through Nepal in
the mid-seventies. In addition, I reflected on them, practiced them as best I
could, and participated in the community life at Kopan. After some months, I decided
I wanted to become a nun. Why? I wanted to focus my life on spiritual development
and knew that to do this effectively, I needed to direct my energies. Living in
vows provided that conducive lifestyle. In addition, as I reflected on the vows,
I saw that I really didn't want to do the things they proscribed. Thus the vows
were a protection against acting upon my attachment, anger, and ignorance - emotions
and attitudes that Buddhism sees as the origin of our suffering and unsatisfactory
state. In addition, the vows helped me to clarify my ethical values and to live
by them.
I requested Lama Yeshe for permission to ordain. He said yes, but
asked me to wait. This waiting period, which lasted nearly a year and a half,
was wise, for it helped me become clear about my motivation. I also had to face
the questions and challenges posed by my family and friends, which strengthened
my motivation. In the spring of 1977, in Dharamsala, India, I was ordained by
Kyabje Ling Rinpoche, the senior tutor of His Holiness the Dalai Lama.
Our
Mind Is the Source of Happiness and Suffering
What attracted me to Buddhism?
I was taken by its ideas perspectives, views, and practices. In particular, the
Buddha's teachings on how to work with emotions - how to subdue disturbing emotions
and enhance positive ones - provided both a logical framework and practical techniques
with which I could work. What, then, is the Buddha's perspective on emotions?
Each
of us wants to be happy and to avoid suffering. From a Buddhist viewpoint, our
mind - specifically its attitudes, views, and emotions - are the primary factors
contributing to our experience of happiness and pain. This view flies in the face
of our usual perception of things. For example, most of us instinctively feel
that happiness is "out there" in an external person, place, or object.
We think, "If I only lived in this house
had this career
married
that person
moved to that place
bought this car, I'd be happy."
We are taught to be good consumers - not just of possessions, but of people, ideas,
spirituality, and everything else as well - in our search for happiness. However,
no matter what we have or how much we have, we are perpetually dissatisfied.
Similarly,
we feel that our problems have been thrust upon us from outside. "I have
difficulties because my parents yelled at me, my boss is inconsistent, my children
don't listen to me, the government is corrupt, others are selfish." Thus
we devise wonderful advice for others to follow and believe that if they only
did what we suggested, not only would our problems cease, but also the world would
be a better place. Unfortunately, when we tell other people how they should change
so that we can be happy, they don't appreciate our sagious advice and instead
tell us to mind our own business!
This innate world view that happiness and
suffering come from external sources leads us to believe that if we could only
make others and the world be what we wanted them to be, then we would be happy.
Thus, we endeavor to rearrange the world and the people in it, gathering towards
us those we consider happiness-producing and struggling to be free from those
we think cause pain. Although we have tried to do this, no one has succeeded in
making the external environment exactly what he or she wants it to be. Even in
those occasional situations in which we are able to arrange external people and
things to be what we want, they don't remain that way for long. Or, they aren't
as good as we thought they would be and we are left feeling disappointed and disillusioned.
In effect, the supposed path to happiness through external things and people is
doomed from the start because no matter how powerful, wealthy, popular, or respected
someone is, he or she is unable to control all external conditions.
This supposed
path to happiness is also doomed because even if we could control external factors,
we still would not be fulfilled and satisfied. Why? Because the source of true
happiness lies in our mind and heart, not in possessions, others' actions, praise,
reputation, and so forth. But we must examine this for ourselves, so the Buddha
asked us to observe our own experiences to see what causes happiness and what
causes misery.
For example, we have all had the experience of waking up on
the wrong side of the bed. Nothing in particular happened to cause us to be in
a bad mood; we simply feel lousy. But, interestingly, just on those days we feel
grumpy, we encounter so many uncooperative and rude people. Just on the day we
want to be left alone, so many obnoxious people descend upon us! Suddenly, the
way our spouse smiles appears sarcastic, and our colleague's "Good morning"
seems manipulative. Even our pet dog no longer seems to love us! When our boss
remarks on our work, we take offense. When our friend reminds us to do something,
we accuse him of being controlling. When someone turns in front of us on the road,
it feels they are deliberately provoking us.
On the other hand, when we are
in a good mood, even if our colleague gives us some negative criticism on a project,
we can put it in perspective. When our professor asks us to redo a paper, we understand
her reasons. When a friend tells us that he was offended by our words, we calmly
explain ourselves and clear up the misunderstanding.
That our interpretations
of events and responses to them change according to our mood says something important,
doesn't it? It indicates that we are not innocent people experiencing an objectively
real external world. Rather, our moods, perspectives, and views play a role in
our experiences. The environment and the people in it aren't objective entities
that exist from their own side as this or that. Instead, together with them, our
mind co-creates our experiences. Thus, if we want to be happy and to avoid suffering,
we need to subdue our unrealistic and non-beneficial emotions and perspectives
and enhance our positive ones.
Working with Emotions
Let's look at some
of the methods the Buddha prescribed to transform specific emotions. Reflection
on impermanence and the unpleasant aspect of a person or thing counteracts attachment.
Cultivating patience and love opposes anger, and wisdom demolishes ignorance.
Thinking about a difficult topic or reflecting that all we know and have comes
from others eliminates pride. Rejoicing prevents jealousy. Following the breath
diminishes doubt. Contemplating our precious human life dispels depression, while
meditating on compassion counteracts low self-esteem.
Reflection on Impermanence
and Unpleasant Aspects Counteracts Attachment
When our mind is under the influence
of attachment, we cling to people, things, or circumstances, thinking that they
have the power to bring us happiness. However, since these things are transient
- their very nature is to change moment by moment - they are not safe objects
to rely on for long term happiness. When we remember that our possessions do not
last forever and our money does not go on to the next life with us, then the false
expectations we project upon them evaporate, and we are able to cultivate a healthy
relationship with them. If we contemplate that we cannot always remain with our
friends and relatives, we will appreciate them more while we are together and
be more accepting of our eventual separation.
Contemplating the unpleasant
aspect of things we are attached to also cuts false expectation and enables us
to have a more balanced attitude towards them. For example, when we have a car,
we will definitely have car trouble. Therefore, no benefit comes from getting
too excited about having a new car, and no great catastrophe has occurred if we
can't get a car. If we have a relationship, we will undoubtedly have relationship
problems. When we first fall in love, we believe that the other person will be
everything we want. This skewed view sets us up for suffering when we realize
that he or she isn't. In fact, no one can be everything we want because we are
not consistent in what we want! This simple process of being more realistic cuts
attachment, enabling us to actually have more enjoyment.
Cultivating Patience
and Love Opposes Anger
Having exaggerated certain negative aspects of a person,
thing, idea, or place, we become angry and unable to bear it. We want either to
harm what we think is causing our unhappiness or to escape from it. Patience is
the ability to bear harm or suffering. With it, our mind is calm, and we have
the mental clarity to figure out a reasonable solution to the difficulty. One
way to cultivate patience is by seeing the disturbing circumstance as an opportunity
to grow. In this way, instead of focusing on what we don't like, we look inside
and develop our resources and talents to be able to deal with it.
Seeing the
situation from the others' perspective also facilitates patience. We ask ourselves,
"What are this person's needs and concerns? How does she see the situation?"
In addition, we can ask ourselves what our buttons are. Instead of blaming the
other person for pushing our buttons, we can work to free ourselves from those
buttons and sensitive points so that they cannot be pushed again.
Cultivating
love - the wish for sentient beings, including ourselves, to have happiness and
its causes - prevents as well as counteracts anger. We may wonder, "Why should
we wish those who have harmed us to be happy? Shouldn't they be punished for their
wrongdoing?" People harm others because they are unhappy. If they were happy,
they would not be doing whatever it is that we found objectionable, because people
don't hurt others when they are content. Instead of seeking punishment or retaliation
for harms done to us, let's wish others to be happy and thus free from whatever
internal or external conditions precipitate their negative actions.
We cannot
tell ourselves we must love someone; rather we must actively cultivate this emotion.
For example, sitting quietly, we begin by thinking and then feeling, "May
I be well and happy." We spread this thought and feeling to dear ones, then
to strangers, and to people we find disagreeable, threatening, or disgusting,
and say again and again to ourselves "May they be well and happy." Finally,
we open our heart and wish happiness and its causes to all living beings everywhere.
Thinking
about Complex Topics and Recognizing Our Indebtedness to Others Eliminates Pride.
When we are proud, we cannot learn or develop new good qualities because we
falsely believe we have attained all there is. When a Buddhist student becomes
arrogant about his scholarship or practice, his teacher often instructs him to
meditate on the twelve sources and eighteen elements. "What are those?"
people ask. That's the point - just hearing the names, let alone understanding
their meaning, makes us realize we have a lot to learn and thus dispels arrogance.
When
we are proud, we have a strong feeling of self, as if whatever qualities we are
proud about are inherently ours. Reflecting that everything we know and have has
come from others quickly dispels this arrogance. Any abilities due to genetics
came from our ancestors; our knowledge came from our teachers. Even our artistic,
musical, or athletic abilities would not have surfaced had it not been due to
the kindness of parents and teachers who encouraged and taught us. Our socio-economic
status is due to others who gave us money. Even if they gave it to us in the form
of a paycheck, it was not ours to begin with. Our education came from others.
Even our ability to tie our shoes came from those who taught us. Looking at our
lives in this way, we are indebted to others' kindness. We have much to be grateful
for and nothing to be arrogant about.
Rejoicing Dispels Jealousy
The jealous
mind cannot endure the happiness of others and wishes that happiness for ourselves.
Although we want to be happy, jealousy itself is a painful emotion, and we are
miserable when we are under its influence. Rejoicing, on the other hand, celebrates
goodness. We always say, "May everyone be happy," so when someone is,
we might as well rejoice in it, especially if we didn't even have to make any
effort to bring it about.
We may start by rejoicing in the happiness we already
have, enabling us to realize that we are not completely bereft of joy even though
we may not have what we want at the time. Then we focus on others' goodness and
happiness and rejoice in them. While this initially may seem uncomfortable due
to the force of the jealousy, if we persist in recounting the goodness and happiness
of others, our mind will, in time, become joyful. "Isn't it wonderful that
Susan excels in sports? How great that Peter was promoted and that Karen got a
new car! Bill and Barbara have a caring relationship; I'm happy for them. Jane's
meditations are going well, and Sam has a lot of contact with his spiritual mentor.
That's great."
Thinking positive thoughts in this way automatically makes
our mind happy. It shifts our perspective from focusing on what we don't have
to the richness in the world.
Following the Breath Diminishes Doubt and Anxiety
When
our mind is turbulent, spinning in doubt or anxiously imagining worse case scenarios,
the Buddha recommended that we focus our attention on the breath. Sitting comfortably,
we breath normally and naturally. We place our attention either at the nostrils,
feeling the touch of the breath on our upper lip and in the nostrils as it passes
in and out, or at the belly, being aware of the rise and fall of our abdomen as
we inhale and exhale. Should our attention shift to the doubts and anxious thoughts,
we recognize this and then patiently but firmly bring our focus back to the breath.
By doing this continuously, the runaway thoughts begin to calm down, and the mind
becomes clear and calm.
Contemplating Our Precious Human Life Dispels Depression
Often
we take our opportunities and fortune for granted and focus on what we lack instead.
This is tantamount to ignoring all the delicious food in a large buffet and complaining,
"There is no spaghetti." Instead of becoming depressed because we are
ill, we can remember that we are also fortunate to have others who help us when
we don't feel well. Even if they don't help us as much as we would like, they
still are there for us, and we would be hard put if they weren't. Something is
always going well in our lives, and it's important to remember those things that
are.
In addition, we have human intelligence and the opportunity to encounter
a spiritual path. This opportunity in itself is cause for great rejoicing. No
matter if we are sick, lonely, imprisoned, or going through hard times financially,
we still can take refuge in the Three Jewels - the Buddhas, Dharma, and Sangha.
We can practice our spiritual tradition no matter where we are, who we're with,
or what the state of our physical body, for genuine spiritual practice does not
depend on certain external implements or actions but involves redirecting our
mind towards constructive emotions and realistic attitudes. Thus for as long as
we are alive, we can be happy about what is going right in our lives and at the
opportunities we have for spiritual practice. Even when it comes time to die,
we can rejoice at a life well-spent and dedicate all the goodness we created for
the benefit of all sentient beings.
Meditating on Compassion and on Our Buddha
Nature Counteracts Guilt and Low Self-esteem
When we suffer from guilt and
low self-esteem, we put all attention on ourselves. There is little space in our
mind for thoughts of others, and everything related to ourselves is overblown.
Guilt is an inverted feeling of self-importance: "I'm the worst one in the
world, unforgivable," or "I'm so powerful that I can make all these
things go wrong." This is totally unrealistic!
Compassion is the wish
for sentient beings, including ourselves, to be free of suffering and its causes.
Meditating on it works in two ways. First, we think, "I am a sentient being,
worthy of happiness and freedom from pain, just like everyone else. I have the
Buddha nature - the underlying purity of mind - just as all living beings do.
Therefore, I can wish myself to be happy and to be free of suffering, and I know
that these are achievable goals because the basic nature of my mind and heart
are pure. The clouds that cover them can be dispelled." Thinking in this
way helps overcome depression.
In addition, spreading our love and compassion
out to others alleviates the pain of the self-preoccupation lying behind guilt
and low self-esteem. By taking the focus off of ourselves, compassion enables
us to realize that everyone is in the same position. Thinking of others and reaching
out to them pulls us out of the isolation of guilt and low self-esteem.
Wisdom
Demolishes Ignorance
From a Buddhist perspective the ignorance misapprehending
the nature of reality is the root of all other disturbing attitudes and negative
emotions. To dispel it, we cultivate wisdom, which is of three types: the wisdoms
of learning, thinking, and meditating. First we must learn from qualified teachers,
either by listening to talks or reading books. Then we think about what we have
learned, examining it thoroughly to test it logically and to make sure we have
understood it properly. Finally, we integrate the meanings of the teachings into
our lives through meditation and continuous practice.
For example, we listen
to teachings on profound reality, the emptiness of inherent existence. We read
about and study these concepts, and then discuss them with our friends as well
as think about them ourselves. When our understanding is correct and refined,
we then familiarize ourselves with emptiness in meditation, first by investigating
the nature of reality and then by focusing single-pointedly on it. When we arise
from meditation, we try to hold this newfound meaning in mind as we go about our
daily life's activities, so that this wisdom will be integrated into our mind
and life.
Since all the other disturbing attitudes and negative emotions are
rooted in the ignorance misapprehending reality, developing this wisdom is a general
antidote to all of these. However, since cultivating the correct view is difficult,
takes time, and requires effort, we practice the antidotes explained above, which
are unique to each particular emotion. By pacifying these emotions even a little,
our mind becomes clearer and more tranquil, which makes the development of wisdom
easier. For this reason, we learn not only the specific methods to counteract
each disturbing attitude, but also wisdom as the antidote to all of them.
Our
Responsibility
Subduing and transforming our mind is a process we alone must
do. While we can pay someone to clean our house or fix our car, hiring someone
to get rid of our negative emotions doesn't work. I can't ask you to sleep late
so that I'll feel refreshed or to eat so my hunger will go away. Just as we must
sleep and eat ourselves to experience their benefits, we must practice ourselves
in order to let go of our harmful emotions and to nourish our constructive ones.
The
Buddha's teachings explain many techniques for subduing our disturbing emotions
and for cultivating positive ones. Just learning these techniques does not transform
us. Reading a book with instructions on how to type does not give us the ability
to sit down at a computer and type perfectly. We need to practice and train ourselves.
In the same way, we must reflect on the techniques taught by the Buddha and then
practice them consistently over a long period of time. The Tibetan word for meditation,
gom, has the same root as the word meaning "to familiarize." Familiarization
takes place with effort and over time. Similarly, we say we "practice the
Dharma," meaning we train ourselves in certain attitudes and emotions over
and over again. In short, there is no shortcut for transforming our mind.
However,
since the disturbing attitudes and negative emotions are not the very nature of
our mind and because they are based on misconceptions, they can be eliminated
through cultivating realistic views and constructive emotions. Our mind and heart
are a stable base for this transformation, and if we cultivate wisdom and compassion
over time, they will increase infinitely. It is our responsibility, for our own
as well as for others' happiness, that we engage in the practice to do so.
Future
Prospects for Buddhism
Over a period of many centuries Buddhism spread throughout
Asia. Now, with modern transportation and communication facilities, it is quickly
coming to Western nations. Nevertheless, it faces many challenges both in Asia
and in the West.
In Asia, Buddhism is widely accepted, but not widely practiced
among its adherents. In some places people have neglected to learn the meaning
of the ceremonies and rituals. In others the religious hierarchy could be re-invigorated
by broadening educational opportunities for nuns and laypeople. Buddhist institutions
need to be more engaged in helping society.
In the West, Buddhism risks becoming
another consumer good, tailored in order to suit the tastes of the public. The
Buddha's teachings have always been a challenge to society and to our egos. We
must be careful not to dilute their essential power in the name of spreading them
to more people. In addition, we must abandon our hidden wishes for an "instant
fix" and be prepared and happy to practice for a long time. His Holiness
the Dalai Lama says that one of the biggest hindrances for Westerners is the expectation
to gain realizations quickly and easily. This attitude makes some people give
up practice when their fanciful ideas are not actualized.
While Buddhism has
much to offer in Asia and the rest of the world, the extent to which it is able
to do so depends on the quality of its practitioners and teachers. Thus we must
try to improve our own learning and practice as well as support others who are
doing so. As individuals and as Buddhist institutions, we must take personal responsibility,
create and maintain harmony, and look out for the common good.
***********************************************************************************************
The
Four Thoughts that Turn the Mind to the Dharma
Alexander Berzin
Morelia,
Mexico, May 30, 2000
Preliminaries
I like to begin classes with a
set of preliminaries. These are various methods to help us quiet down and get
into an appropriate state of mind for meditating or listening to teachings. In
order to be able to get into something fully we need to enter into it slowly and
appropriately. That is purpose of preliminaries.
There are many different ways
to get into a state of mind conducive for meditating or for listening. I usually
follow just one of many possibilities. This method starts with counting the breath.
When we are very distracted emotionally or mentally, from our work, from traveling
here or whatever, it is very important to first quiet down into a neutral state.
This helps us to relax. The way that we do this is to breathe normally through
the nose, which means not to quickly, not to slowly, not to deeply and not to
shallowly. The cycle is to first breathe out, then allow a slight pause and because
we have made a slight pause, we naturally breathe in more deeply. That is a much
more relaxed way of breathing deeply than consciously taking a deep breath. As
we breathe back in, we count it as one in our minds. Then, without holding the
breath we breathe out. We repeat this cycle eleven times and then repeat the count
of eleven two or three times, depending on our speed. The numbers don't really
matter. We can count up to any number. We do not need to get superstitious about
it. The point is to occupy the verbal energy of our mind with something so that
we are not thinking something else while focusing on the breath. Let us do that
please.
Once we have quieted down, we try to get our energies, our mind and
emotions, going in a positive way. We do this by affirming our motivation. Why
we are here? What do we want to gain or to accomplish by being here, or by meditating?
We are here to learn more methods to apply to ourselves personally to help us
in our lives. We are not just coming for entertainment or amusement or for intellectual
knowledge. We are here to learn something practical. It is the same thing when
meditating. It is not just for relaxation or a hobby or sport. We meditate to
try to help ourselves to develop beneficial habits for use in our lives. We don't
do it to please our teacher. We are doing it because we are convinced that it
is beneficial. We want to listen to something practical because we would like
to be able to deal with difficulties in our lives more skillfully, and not just
make our lives a little bit better, but eventually go all the way and get free
of all the difficulties we have. We would like to learn methods that will help
us to become Buddhas so that we can really be of best help to everyone.
When
we reaffirm our motivation, not only do we look at what we are doing here at a
teaching, but it is important also to look at the final aim. Although we may aim
for liberation and enlightenment it is not going to happen overnight and miracles
normally do not happen. Dharma is not magic. We are not going to learn magic means
that will suddenly free us from all our suffering. It is not that we learn some
methods and day-by-day it is going to get better and better. We need to be realistic.
Realistically speaking, as we know from our own life experience, the moods and
events in our lives go up and down, and they will continue to go up and down.
We can hope that things will get better in the long run; but from day to day,
we are going to have difficult moments. It is not that all of a sudden we will
never get upset again. If we approach learning Dharma methods and in practicing
them in meditation and in daily life in a realistic, down to earth way, we will
not get discouraged. Even when really difficult things come up in life and even
if we still get upset we are not thrown off course. This is our motivation. This
is our aim. This is our understanding of what we can gain from coming to teachings
and meditating and practicing.
It is important to remind ourselves of this
by reviewing and thinking about it. Let's say we are very upset before a meditation
session. Instead of taking refuge in food, friends, sex, television or beer we
take refuge in the Dharma and meditate to help us get over being upset. Even in
that situation we need to be very careful not to expect that it will be like taking
a shot of heroin, as if we could sit and meditate and feel high and joyous and
all of our problems would be gone. If that does happen, be suspicious. If we do
the meditation properly, sure we may feel better. But it might not make us feel
a hundred percent better. Unless we are super-advanced, the unpleasant mood will
likely come back. As I often repeat, "What do you expect from samsara?"
When we reaffirm our motivation we say, "Okay, I am going to do this
because it will help me. I will try to apply these things properly to help me
get free from this difficulty that I experience and to eventually be of help to
others." Whether we feel better a half hour from now or not is not the point.
That is not our main focus. We are going in a certain direction in life and this
is what we are doing to go further in that direction. The direction is refuge.
Each time we listen to teachings or meditate, we take another step in that direction.
We keep going, despite the ups and downs. That is realistic. Let us reaffirm that
for a moment.
Then we make the conscious decision to meditate with concentration.
This means that if our attention wanders we will bring it back, if we get sleepy
we will try to wake ourselves up. To help our minds to be clearer we sit up straight
and to help our minds be clearer we can use the visualization of a camera coming
into focus.
Then there is a fine adjustment that we can make. First, we try
to lift the energies in our body if we are feeling a bit heavy and our energies
are too low. For this, we focus on the point between our eyebrows with our heads
looking upwards but our heads staying level.
Then to ground our energies if
they are running a bit wild in our bodies and we are bit stressed, we focus on
the navel with our eyes looking downwards but our heads staying level. We breathe
in normally and hold our breath until we need to breathe out.
Introduction
This evening I have been asked to speak about another aspect of preliminaries,
namely the four thoughts that turn the mind to the Dharma. Specifically, the four
thoughts are:
1. thinking about appreciating the precious human life,
2.
thinking about death and impermanence, that the opportunities that we have now
with this precious opportunity are not going to last,
3. thinking about the
laws of karma and cause and effect, in other words how our behavior affects what
we experience,
4. thinking about the disadvantages of samsara, of uncontrollably
recurring rebirth.
If we appreciate the opportunities that we have now with
this precious human life and if we recognize and acknowledge the fact that this
life is not going to last and that we are going to die sometime, if we recognize
that our behavior is going to shape our experience in this life and also after
we die in future lives, and if we realize that no matter what we experience in
the future, because it will arise from behaving from confusion, will have be a
lot of difficulties and troubles then we will turn our minds to the Dharma.
The
Safe Direction of Refuge
What does it mean to turn our minds to the Dharma?
It basically means taking refuge. It is quite clear that taking refuge is not
something that you do after walking into a Dharma center for the first time. It
is not to join a social club or a Dharma center. Taking refuge is something quite
advanced and requires an appropriate state of mind. I find that the term "taking
refuge" is inadequate and gives a misleading impression. In our languages,
it implies something passive -- that we go a more powerful person or being and
say save me, protect me and we are protected. Then we don't have to do so much
from our side. This is not what Buddhism is talking about. Rather, what we are
talking about is putting an active, safe, positive direction in our life. That
is why I call it taking safe direction. We need to have these four attitudes or
understandings before we can put this direction in our life with sincere conviction.
This implies that we need to have some idea of what this direction is.
What
is this direction? It is Buddha, Dharma and Sangha, the Three Jewels. What in
the world does that mean? We often look at this in a very elementary way. We think
of the Dharma as the teachings, the Buddha as the one who actually gave these
teachings both verbally and in terms of his own realizations, and the Sangha refers
to something like the congregation of a Buddhist church or Dharma center. That
is not what Sangha means. We are talking about very advanced practitioners who
already have straightforward perception of reality and are already well on the
way to becoming liberated or enlightened. Even if we say, "I am going in
the direction of the Dharma teachings as the Buddha taught them and as great practitioners
are realizing them," this type of elementary understanding of the Three Jewels
is not a very stable basis for putting this direction in our life.
What is
the basis for being convinced that this is a positive direction? We need a slightly
more sophisticated understanding of the Buddha, Dharma and Sangha. The more sophisticated
our understanding, the firmer our direction will be. This means that this whole
topic of refuge is not something that we ought to trivialize. "I did that
in the beginning when I first came to the center and now I have a red string to
wear around my neck." It is a topic that we need to work on and deepen as
we go further along the path. The deeper this direction in our lives is, the more
stable we are on the spiritual path.
The actual direction is indicated by the
Dharma Jewel, which must be understood within the context of the four noble truths.
These are the four facts that any person who sees reality -- a highly realized
being -- would see as true. They are called "noble" because that is
how some people translate the Sanskrit word arya. When we see reality directly,
we see these four facts. The first fact is the difficulties in life -- what are
they really? Then we see the real causes of these difficulties. Then we see the
stopping of the difficulties in life and their causes. Then we see that there
is a pathway of mind, in other words a way of understanding, that will bring about
that understanding of reality by removing the main cause of the problems: confusion.
When we get rid of the cause of our problems, confusion, we get rid of the problems.
True direction is indicated by the third and fourth noble truths. That is
the actual Dharma refuge. Without leaving it as jargon, what we are actually aiming
at is this state in which all problems and their causes are removed in such a
way that they never come back again, as well as the state of mind that not only
brings that about but that results from this. When all difficulties and shortcomings
are removed, we have a state of mind in which we are able to use all of our abilities.
What is our Dharma direction? It is the state of liberation and the state
of enlightenment. Liberation is a state in which all of our suffering and its
causes are finished. Enlightenment is a state in which we are able to help others
as much as is possible and where the things that prevent us from being able to
do that are removed forever. Buddhas are those who have achieved both of these
fully and who have shown us how to do it. They have shown us how to do it in terms
of their realizations as well as by giving step-by-step instructions. The Sangha
are those who have achieved at least some liberation from some of the problems
and their causes and are working further, so they are already incredibly advanced.
The Gateway to the Dharma
In order to be able to turn our minds and energies
toward liberation and enlightenment, we have to know two things. We have to know
what liberation and enlightenment actually mean. They are not just nice words.
And, secondly, we need conviction that it really is possible to achieve these.
If we are not convinced that it is possible to gain liberation and enlightenment,
why would we want to work toward achieving them? How do we gain this conviction?
What are the steps that will lead us toward this?
One great Sakya master,
Sonam-tsemo, wrote a very helpful text called The Gateway to the Dharma. He addressed
this very question. He said we need three things. First, we need to recognize
and acknowledge the suffering and difficulties in our lives. In other words, we
have to really look at ourselves honestly and evaluate what is going on in our
lives. The second is having a very sincere wish to get out of this suffering,
not just to "make the best of it," but really wanting to get out of
this. The third thing is some knowledge of the Dharma so that we have some conviction
that the Dharma is going to show us a way out. That conviction is not just based
on the nice words of some charismatic person. We have to have some actual knowledge
and understanding of the Dharma and of how it leads us out of suffering.
What
is the way out? It is gaining liberation and gaining enlightenment. The Dharma
shows us how to do this based on the first noble truth, that of suffering. That
is what Sonam-tsemo said we have to start with, recognizing the problems. And
there is a cause for those problems. They are coming from somewhere. To achieve
an elimination of the cause of our problems, the third noble truth, we have to
have a path of understanding; and that is the fourth noble truth, which gets rid
of confusion.
It is not at all easy to gain conviction that it is possible
to remove the causes of our difficulties. We need to persevere and work on it.
We must try to understand what this is talking about. We can start to work with
this in a logical way. We experience life now with confusion. For example, we
imagine that we are the most important person in the world and the center of the
universe. Based on that, we always feel we have to have our way and we become
very greedy and pushy. We are the most important one, so everybody has to pay
attention to us and love us. If people don't pay attention to us and don't love
us, then we get very angry.
We may be loveable but that does not mean that
the whole world needs to recognize it! With confusion, we think everyone should
recognize it. Or we go the other way and think that if people don't love us or
pay attention to us something must be wrong with us and we are no good and then
we have low self-esteem. In either case, we suffer. We have mental anguish and
it is all coming from the confusion that we are the center of the universe and
everything should go the way that we want it to.
Buddha said that it is possible
to get rid of all of the misery that we experience by getting rid of this attitude
of confusion that causes it. What will get rid of the confusion? Understanding.
If we understand how we and everyone in the world exists, we won't be confused
about it. We cannot have both confusion and understanding in one moment of mind.
Understanding is the exact opponent to confusion. Since we cannot have both at
the same time, which is going to win? If we examine confusion, the more closely
we examine, we see that it really does not stand up to analysis. Am I really the
center of the universe? Well, no, because everyone else thinks that they are the
center of the universe. On the other hand, if we examine understanding, it does
hold up. No one is the center of the universe. What that means is that no one
is more important than everyone else. Nobody is the center of everyone else's
attention and loved by all. The more we examine this, the more we see that it
makes sense. It is not only true based on logic, but also from experience and
from seeing how life works.
Because understanding can be verified and confusion
falls apart when we examine it, not only can understanding replace confusion temporarily,
but it can get rid of it forever. When we understand that there is no center of
the universe, we know that not everyone will pay attention to us and love us.
Not everyone loved and paid attention to Buddha, so why to us? The result of this
analysis is that we don't get upset. It doesn't matter if people don't pay attention
to us. What do we expect from samsara? Because we are not upset, we are able to
deal with each person in a way that is warm, loving, understanding and so on,
without being worried about whether they will listen to us or like us. We try
our best. In this way, we work on an initial level to become more convinced that
liberation and enlightenment actually are possible. Then we are not crazy for
working in the direction of achieving liberation and enlightenment.
The Four
Thoughts in Reverse Sequence
The four thoughts that turn our mind to the Dharma
show us on a slightly deeper level that this is possible. We have discussed how
it is possible to gain conviction in the possibility of liberation and enlightenment
in terms of the three basic thoughts needed to enter the Dharma: suffering, wanting
to get out of suffering, and having the conviction that it is possible to get
out of suffering. The four thoughts that turn our mind to the Dharma actually
turn our minds toward these three thoughts, specifically to the first of these
three steps, recognizing and acknowledge the difficulties and sufferings in life.
The last of the four thoughts is of the unsatisfactoriness of samsara, which is
the actual acknowledgement of difficulties and problems in life. We need to work
backwards in order to appreciate the order and necessity of each step.
What
are the difficulties and problems that we face? Buddha gave many lists, but the
more concise one is a list of three. We can call them the three types of problems.
The first is gross suffering: pain and unhappiness. It includes physical pain
as well as mental pain. Most people can recognize this without much difficulty.
Nobody likes to be unhappy, so most people would like to get out of it.
The
second problem is the problem of change. This refers to our usual ordinary experiences
of happiness, which are tainted with confusion. They change; they do not last.
For instance, we eat and feel the happiness of our stomach being full but it does
not last and we get hungry again. What is the problem? The problem is not that
the happiness does not last. That is just the nature of this type of happiness.
Having the most profound, direct understanding of voidness is not going to change
the fact that this type of happiness is impermanent. Nothing is going to change
that. We can get less upset by the fact that it changes, but that is not the point
here. The real problem with this type of happiness is the uncertainty factor:
when it ends, we do not know what will follow. We are with our friends, having
a good time. The good time ends and we don't know if we are going to feel happy,
tired, unhappy or what. That is the real problem here. Just going after this temporary
happiness will not help us, even though we feel okay for a while. Not only does
it not eliminate all our problems, but we are left in a state of real insecurity,
not knowing what will come next.
The third type of true problem is the all-encompassing
problem. This is that just the type of body and mind and emotions that we have
will perpetuate all the other problems. They are self-perpetuating. We have this
type of body. We have to feed it and take care of it all the time. And when we
eat, the happiness does not last and we have to eat again and again. How boring.
We go into one difficult relationship with someone and do not learn and get hurt
and go into another and another. The confusion just goes on and on. This person
did not turn out to be Prince or Princess Charming and so we look for another
and another. The feelings of insecurity keep coming up. This is the real problem;
it just keeps on recurring. Understanding these three sufferings is the fourth
thought, the disadvantages of suffering. It is also the first noble truth, that
of problems.
What is the basis for this understanding of the disadvantages
of samsara? The third thought, the understanding of karma and cause and effect.
This is the cause of the suffering of samsara. This is noble truth number two.
Why do we experience the first type of true problem, gross suffering? From acting
in destructive ways. We act destructively because of confusion. We don't understand
the results of our actions or we think that our actions have no results.
The
second type of problem is that of change and uncertainty. To understand the reason
why we experience that, we need to understand karma. If we understand karma, we
understand that what we experience is very complex. We have been doing so many
things, both constructive and destructive mixed with confusion, without any beginning.
We could think we are the center of the universe and be nice to everyone or mean
to everyone. We have built up millions and millions of both positive and negative
karmic potentials. So, we experience happiness for a moment. It comes from a positive
potential. Then it is finished. Now what? There are countless karmic possibilities
waiting to ripen. What ripens next? It is not simple. It depends on many different
factors: our attitude, the circumstance, what other people do, our health and
so on. No wonder there is no certainty, and no wonder that our experience in samsara
goes up and down. The twelve links of dependent arising describes how karma and
confusion perpetuate samsara. When we understand karma deeply, then we understand
how the whole mechanism of karma goes up and down, perpetuating itself, which
is the all-encompassing problem.
The third thought that turns our mind to
the Dharma gets us into the state of mind of understanding why there is this uncertainty.
What will turn our minds to thinking that way? Awareness of death and impermanence.
Our lifespan is uncertain. This is the second thought that turns our mind to the
Dharma. If we take death and impermanence seriously, realizing that situations
do not last on a gross level, then we can start to appreciate the teachings on
karma, which show us the uncertainty of what happens from moment to moment.
What
is going to bring us to think about death? Appreciating the life and opportunities
that we have now: this precious human life. So, thinking about the precious human
life that we have now is the first thought that turns our mind to the Dharma.
Summary
By working backwards in this way, we can see how each attitude arises from
the previous one. One can explain it going from one to four in a logical sequence.
But, since most of you have studied this already, I wanted to present it in reverse
order to show how each thought depends on the previous one. In forward order,
we think of our precious human life, that it is not going to last forever and
that what happens after death, in future lives, depends on karma. Even if we are
born in a favorable situation, there will be many problems. Realizing this, we
want to get out of suffering. For that, we need conviction that the Dharma actually
does teach the way out and that it is actually possible to achieve liberation
from problems and enlightenment. That leads us to take safe direction and to develop
bodhichitta, with which we dedicate ourselves completely to achieving enlightenment
to be able to benefit everyone.
In reverse, as we have seen, in order to put
safe direction and bodhichitta in our lives, we need conviction that it is possible
to get rid of suffering and its causes. For that, we need to understand the nature
of confusion and how understanding gets rid of confusion. For that, we need to
recognize the difficulties in our life, the difficulties of samsara: the recurrence
of problems and uncertainty. That uncertainty is because of karma. To start thinking
in terms of uncertainty, we need first to think about it on the gross level of
death. We would not worry about death, if we didn't think about the life that
we have now with its opportunities and did not want to lose it.
Whether we
look at these four thoughts in a progressive or a reverse sequence, they are very
essential for helping us to become stable on the path so that we can be of more
help to ourselves and more help to others.
Questions and Answers
Question:
How does uncertainty fit into mundane concerns and thinking that if I could only
have this or that, I would be happy?
Answer: It depends on what we think will
bring us happiness. If we think, "If I could only gain enlightenment, I would
be happy" it is different from thinking, "If I could only have the perfect
partner, I would be happy forever and never have any suffering." If we are
looking for the total removal of suffering, such that it never returns again,
from chocolate, a partner, sex or whatever, then we are always going to be frustrated.
However, if we acknowledge the ordinary type of happiness for what it is, then
we can aim for it as a provisional goal. If we have a certain level of happiness,
we can use it as a circumstance to go further on the path. That is why the initial
scope of the lamrim graded path is aiming for a fortunate rebirth. We need general
worldly happiness as a circumstance for working toward liberation and enlightenment.
It all depends on recognizing our usual type of happiness for what it is and not
inflating it. We need to have our feet on the ground.
Conclusion
It is
quite helpful to work with these four thoughts. They are called preliminaries
in the sense that they get us into an appropriate state of mind to be on the path
very firmly, just as the preliminaries before class get us into an appropriate
state of mind to listen to teachings. What does it mean to get onto the path of
Dharma? We can talk about it in technical terms, but let's not talk about it on
that level. To be on the path means to really be convinced in what we are doing
and to have our hearts in it fully. Otherwise, we are not very stable. We may
do it a little while as a hobby or because other people are doing it, but we are
not really into it.
To be really into it requires a change of attitude. It
requires a certain way of looking at life. It requires really seeing our life
situation and acknowledging that there are problems and difficulties. It is important
to appreciate our precious human life and to know that it is not going to last
forever. Our life has problems and these problems come about basically because
of confusion and karma. Even though we experience happiness in our lives, it is
not really satisfying because it does not last and we cannot guarantee that we
will stay in a good mood. It is not good enough to just be happy some of the time.
We may know that we get into dysfunctional relationships, but because they
are exciting and fun in the beginning, we get into another one knowing that we
or the other person will mess it up. And then we get into another and another.
Eventually, we get tired of that and say, "I really want to stop this!"
We become convinced that it is possible to stop it. Based on that conviction,
we can realistically work toward stopping it.
While on the way, we need to
try to gain temporary happiness, because it will make it easier to go on the path.
But our experience will go up and down. Instead of constantly going out to find
Prince and Princess Charming, we can get in some sort of relationship that is
not going to be perfect -- it is never going to be perfect on this level -- and
we can use that as the basis for working further. It is the same thing with money.
If our entire lives are spent searching for more and more money, it is never-ending.
We do need a certain amount of material comfort to be able to live and likewise
we need a certain level of affection, love and partnership in order to have the
conducive circumstances to work on ourselves. The relationship with a partner
is never going to be perfect. The amount of money in the bank will never be perfect.
The amount of comfort that we have in our home will never be perfect. This is
the problem of change. Working to try to make those perfect is just banging our
heads against the wall. When we have enough of these things to be able to get
on with our spiritual life, we need to get on with our spiritual life! The point
is to use the imperfect level that we have to work toward something that we can
realistically attain: the ultimate state. We can remove the confusion from our
minds, and that means that we can eliminate suffering. That is what it is all
about. In this way, we will be happy and we will be able to make others happy.
Will we be more able to help others by always trying to get the perfect partner,
or by working to get rid of our anger?
Dedication
Let us end with a dedication.
May whatever understanding we might have gained go deeper and deeper so that it
slowly starts to make an impression on us and adds to our positive potentials
so that we gradually start to see things in terms of these four thoughts. May
we gradually become more stable in our safe direction in life so that we can eventually
attain liberation and enlightenment for the benefit of everyone.
***********************************************************************************************
Transforming
Problems
by Venerable Thubten Chodron©
When talking
about "Transforming Problems", I think you might prefer I talk more
about rejecting problems, rather than transforming them. Our usual attitude is
to reject problems, isn't it?
"I don't want problems! You can have them!
It's not fair that I have problems. I shouldn't have problems. My life should
be happy. The universe is unfair if I have problems. Something's wrong if I have
problems. Everything should be perfect."
This is our usual attitude.
Our usual attitude is one of rejecting problems, isn't it? "Problems should
go away because the universe should treat me better."
Why? "Because
I'm me! I'm important! I should be happy! The universe should treat me very well!
Nobody should mistreat me. If I mistreat other people, it's because they deserved
it. But nobody should mistreat me. Nobody should insult me. If I insult other
people, it's because they were really creeps and made a mistake. Nobody should
do that to me." My happiness is really important - much more important than
anybody else's happiness. The universe should know that. Everybody should appreciate
me - don't you think? Don't you think I'm the most important one in the universe?
Isn't this how we think? We're much too polite to admit it in public, but
you know what I mean. This is really how we live our lives. So, our whole life
we reject problems.
Something is wrong. When we have a problem, it's never
our fault, is it? Have you ever started a fight? I mean, when there's a fight,
it's always the other person's fault. Very clearly.
When there's a quarrel,
it's never my fault; it's always the other person's fault. It's all these other
people who are uncooperative, and obnoxious, domineering, bossy, and critical.
Not me. "I was going through life minding my own business, completely kind-hearted,
loving, compassionate to everybody. Then, all these mean people do all these awful
things to me. It's unfair. It's terrible." Right?
I have a friend who
teaches conflict management; dispute resolution. He often gives people a worksheet,
to record a recent conflict they had, and to assess how they handled the conflict,
and how the other person handled the conflict.
He said, "It's remarkable!
All the people who were cooperative, kind, and harmonious, they all come to the
conflict resolution workshop. But all the people who were disagreeable and quarrelsome
- they never come."
According to the form - it's amazing, he said, all
the people who come to him were those trying to solve the problems; who never
start them. It's just remarkable.
This is kind of how we live our life, isn't
it? Problems are never my doing, they're somebody else's doing. And you know -
"That's because other people are idiots. They just don't know how to treat
me properly."
Then we come to a Buddhist thing, and we hear, "Well,
when you have problems; when you have suffering, it's due to your karma."
And we go - "My karma?! I'm not doing anything wrong. Look at that guy! He's
creating negative karma being mean to me. I didn't do anything wrong. This is
unfair. I'm going to complain to the Chief of Karma, because I didn't create any
negative karma. I mean, I'm just nice to everybody all the time." Right?
Me? "I never tell anybody off. I'm never judgmental. I'm never critical.
I'm never hostile. I never lie to anybody. I never cheat anybody." Why is
the world doing this to me?
And in my past lives, I'm sure I never did any
of that. Never! "My past life, I was a Rinpoche. I was high. They just don't
recognize who I am this lifetime. But I was very special in my previous life.
Maybe not a Rinpoche, but I was very high, you know? I never created any bad karma.
What are you talking about, 'it's my bad karma' when I have problems. Baloney!"
This
is what we think, isn't it? We accept the Dharma when it's convenient for us.
When we hear suffering comes from negative karma, we accept that so the person
who's harming us gets it in their next lifetime! Then we believe in karma. But
when we have a problem - to think it's because of what we did in our previous
lifetime? Never! Never! And, certainly not this lifetime.
We're all right,
aren't we? We're always right. When there's a conflict, we're always right. So
there's no need to talk about 'Transforming Problems', because we're right. There's
nothing to transform. "I'm right! You're wrong! You change!" Very easy.
That's how we should solve problems.
We kind of go through our whole life
with that attitude, don't we? When there's a problem: "I'm right, you're
wrong. You should do something different. Me? I shouldn't. I'm just the innocent
victim."
This attitude really compounds problems because every time we
face some difficulty, first we reject the difficulty, and secondly, we blame it
on the other person. Both of these typical behaviors and attitudes really increase
problems. Because, when we reject a problem, then we're fighting the reality.
The reality is - there's a problem. There's suffering. I have a problem. Something's
not going right.
So, I think a lot of our mental suffering comes because we
don't accept there is a problem, and we think the universe is being unfair and
should be different. Our non-acceptance of the problem gives us more trouble than
the problem itself. We get all tangled up in our thoughts about how it's unfair,
it shouldn't happen, and blah, blah, blah, blah. Our non-acceptance makes it worse.
Blaming
the problem on the other person increases the problem, too. Because, we can never
control the other person, can we? The problem is the other person's fault - that
means, I have no power. I have nothing to do, because I'm not involved in it at
all. If the problem is entirely the other person's fault, then the only way to
solve the problem is for the other person to change. But we can't make them change.
And we try. We try very hard, don't we? It is very hard to make others change.
We give them lots of advice. Especially our family members. So much advice - "You
should do this, and you should do that; why don't you do this, and why don't you
do that?" We give everybody advice, and they don't appreciate us. They tell
us to mind our own business. We're just giving them advice about how they should
improve and be happy
and they say, "Get off my case, I don't want to
hear your advice!" And we reply, "Oh, but I was just trying to help
you."
So this thing when we're always blaming the other person? When we
have that attitude we very much give up our power and ability to do anything.
We can't control the other person. We can't make them change.
We might be
right. There might be a conflict, and we might be very right, and the other person
might be wrong. But so what? Sometimes being right doesn't solve the conflict
at all, does it? We can be very, very right and even the court system can agree
that we're right and the other guy is wrong. But there's still conflict, and there's
still unhappiness. Being right doesn't solve the conflict.
And rubbing it
in to the other person, that we are right, doesn't solve the conflict either.
And it doesn't make the other person change. Frequently, when we're right, we
really rub it into the other person, don't we? Then, they feel hurt. They feel
misunderstood. They feel rejected. And they become even more entrenched in their
position than before. They're certainly not going to go out of their way to help
us when we're rubbing it in that we're right and they're wrong.
So, often we
have to give up this idea that just because we're right, everything should change,
and the other person should do something differently. We might explain to them
how their behavior is harmful and they should do things differently, and they
have been doing it this way fifty or sixty years - fifty or sixty lifetimes, you
know? They are not going to change right away. Sometimes we need to develop a
little patience. Being right is not sufficient.
But it's hard, isn't it? When
we can see very clearly what somebody's mistake is, and we know exactly how they
should improve, and they don't do it, and we still have to live with them? We
still have to live with them, don't we? We can't throw them in a garbage can.
We try. But they're too big. They don't fit.
This is something hard about life.
Especially when it happens in Buddhist centers, or at work, or in families - when
there's conflict and we might be right, and we must accept that the other person
is not going to change? Sometimes they don't know how to change. They don't know
how to do something differently. They have this pattern, and that's the way it
is. The only way for us to be happy is to accept them for what they are. What
they are may not be what we want them to be. But surely, what we are isn't what
they want us to be either. So we're kind of even, aren't we?
It's an interesting
thing to play with - to think about conflicts in our own life; problems in our
own life - to see how we always want the other person to change, because, "it's
their fault." Then, to think, "Is it really realistic? Is that person
going to change? Do they know how to change?"
If they're not going to
change, then what can we do - spend the next ten years or the rest of our lives
hating them? Quarrelling with them? Making everyone else in the family, or the
Buddhist center, or on the job, miserable, because we're always arguing, because,
"They don't change!"?
Whereas, if there is a way to accept the fact
they aren't going to be who I want them to be
kind of an interesting thought,
isn't it? Accepting people for what they are? Accepting they may not be what we
want them to be?
It's hard, isn't it? Because, we feel, they really should
be what we want them to be. They should! "How am I going to be happy if they
aren't what I want them to be?" So, we go back and forth in this way. We
truly have to work quite deeply with our mind, very hard with our mind, developing
a kind of acceptance of people for what they are.
We also need to work very
hard with looking at our own role in conflicts, acknowledging our own parts. This
can often require accepting what we did in this lifetime to get involved in the
conflict, and also considering what we did in previous lives may be involved.
When
there is a conflict, there is more than one side, more than one person. How can
we say it is always the other person's fault? If I was not there, there would
not be a conflict. So, how did I get here? What am I doing? What did I do that
bugged the other person so that they're acting like this? Maybe I did nothing.
Maybe it's all coming from their side - in which case, then, it's due to my previous
life's karma.
But, sometimes, looking in this lifetime we can see we haven't
been the most considerate person to other people. They get angry and upset with
something we've done, and we feel, well, "Why me? What did I do? I didn't
do anything." Yet, if we look a bit closer, maybe we did.
Sometimes we
did something without meaning to, and we were just careless, completely unaware.
It's not that we're bad people. We're not careful, so we do something disturbing
to somebody, and they get angry.
And at other times we do things and we kind
of know it's going to bother the other person, don't we? It's the small things
we kind of do it, and try to slip by as if it were just an accident? But we know
it's going to bug the other person. And we do this with the people we live with,
the people we know very well. Because we know what bugs them, don't we? They know
what bugs us; we know what bugs them.
Say, my husband's not paying enough attention
to me
so I just do this little thing. It's very innocent. But he gets mad,
and I go, "What did I do? You're always so irritable! Why are you behaving
like this? You don't love me?"
But if we look closely, we know what we're
doing. We know how to push their buttons. And, so sometimes, part of our mind
deliberately pushes other people's buttons. Because then they pay attention to
us. Finally my husband stops reading the newspaper and looks at me!
Thus,
often it's worthwhile to think in a situation, "Did I do something carelessly,
or maybe with my own rather manipulative mind wanting to irritate the other person?"
In this case I should own up to it, and acknowledge my role in the conflict. Then,
seeing how our own energy, in this lifetime, was involved in the conflict, that
gives us some ability to actually transform the problem. We see what we could
do differently. "If I were more careful, if I didn't deliberately push that
person's button, then some of these conflicts wouldn't happen."
Now, especially
in families, there are repeated conflicts. Have you ever noticed we fight about
the same things all the time in the family? It's like, "Okay, we're going
to have Fight Number Five. Put in that video!" Now, we have the five standard
fights - we lack creativity. We can't think of something new to fight about. It's
the same old thing
25 years, we're fighting over the same stuff. And it's
the same with our parents and our kids, isn't it? Same old spats, again and again,
and again. It's real boring, isn't it? Boring. We know precisely what's going
to happen - we're going to say this; they're going to say that - you could almost
write a script for it. It's true, isn't it? We could write a script: "Okay
you're lying
"
It would be good to trade roles, then... "Okay,
Fight Number Five. You play me and I'll play you, and then, let's go do it!"
Because, the fight is so old hat. We've done it again and again. "So, let's
switch roles this time, okay? You be the one who wants to spend the money, and
I'll be the one who wants to save the money. Let's do it differently this time!"
This
is why it's so interesting - seeing what our role is in this lifetime, how we
get involved; then also, recognizing the karmic effects from our previous lifetime.
There are many times we don't deliberately antagonize someone, we really are minding
our own business, and someone gets all bent out of shape over something we do,
and they really rip into us. And, it's like, "Wooo...what's happening here?"
Often, if we look closely, the other person is acting out of their own pain
and unhappiness, and confusion. It doesn't really have so much to do with us.
But we take it personally anyway, don't we? Often, what the other person is
doing when really dumping on us - when they're critical, speaking harshly, they're
making a stronger statement about themselves than about us. They're actually saying,
"I'm unhappy," or, "I'm confused," or, "I'm miserable."
But, we don't hear that message. We only hear, "Get off my toes! What are
you doing to me?!"
Then, it's often effective to step back and think,
"Why is this person doing this? What are they really trying to say? What's
motivating them?" And that approach helps us to develop some compassion towards
them.
Considering our previous life's karma is involved can be very helpful,
too. Especially when somebody criticizes us and we feel, "I really didn't
do anything." It's helpful to think, "Well, maybe in previous lives,
I criticized somebody."
Look at us! We've all hurt others' feelings.
We've all criticized others. We've lied. We've stolen. Ten non-virtuous acts?
We've all done them! We know everything about each other. We've all done this
- in previous lives especially, we've had lots of time for training in non-virtue.
No, not so much training for virtue in previous lives
otherwise, we wouldn't
be here. You know? Very good practice in non-virtue. So, of course, this lifetime
we have some problems. It's no big surprise. Is it? It's really no big surprise.
I
find this way of thinking very, very helpful for situations when I feel I had
no intention of starting a conflict, and yet here's this whole horrible thing
happening. If I think, obviously, in previous lives I did something, and here
it is, and it's ripening, then I accept it.
I accept it. It's ripening. I got
myself into this situation. Now, my job is to ensure I don't create more negative
karma. Because clearly the problem now is due to a previous life's karma. So,
at least let's not create more negative karma, and we can avoid perpetuating the
same thing again.
But, what often happens, how do we react when we have a problem?
We get angry, don't we? Or, we get very attached. We have a problem, so we cling
to something because we feel insecure. Or, we want to strike back at whatever
is causing our problem. Yet, when we react to problems with clinging, or anger,
what we do is create karmic imprints for problems in future lives. And we continue
the cycle.
Personally, I find it helpful to think, "Okay. This is a result
of my previous life karma. No sense getting attached. No sense getting angry.
Here it is. It's happening, folks. I just have to live through it. I must do as
best I can to make the best of this situation."
It's often quite helpful
when recognizing the problem as due to karma, to transform that problem, saying,
"Okay. This is the challenge." Instead of rejecting the problem, say,
"This situation is a challenge for me to grow." Our problems are challenges
for us to grow, aren't they? They really are. Often, if we look back over our
life, we see the times when we've grown the most are those times we've had lots
of problems. Can you look back at times when you've had problems, really painful
times in your life, and look at yourself now, seeing how you are as a result of
having had that experience?
And sure, it was painful. It was awful. But it's
over now. It doesn't exist anymore. We lived through it. And, we actually grew
in some ways. Because, in particular, when things are really a challenge, when
everything seems to be falling apart around us, then, that's an excellent opportunity
to find our own inner resources, and the support of our community, or within our
Dharma friends in the broader society.
So, when we have problems, there really
is a lot of opportunity for growth. If we take that opportunity. If we avoid retreating
into our old patterns, like getting angry, or feeling sorry for ourselves.
We
fall so easily into our old patterns of self-pity, or lashing out and dumping
on the other person. But when we do, we never grow. We completely ignore the whole
opportunity for growth that this problem is presenting. We just do the same old
thing again and again. And the curious thing is, the same old thing never makes
us happy, does it? We have these old behaviors for handling problems, and they
never work. Say there's a conflict, and I'm so mad; and what's my typical behavior?
"I'm so mad at you that I'm not going to talk to you! Chao!" I shut
down, completely. I will not talk to you. I walk out of the room when you come
in. I look away. I go to my room feeling sorry for myself, and angry at you.
And
we think this is going to make us happy. So we keep doing it. And, we feel miserable.
So, I believe it's very important for us to identify our old habits, our old
patterns, do some serious reflection, while asking, "Do these old patterns
and habits make me happy? Do they actually resolve the conflict?"
Or,
do we get unhappier because of the way we're handling the conflict? I say, "I'm
so mad, so I won't talk to you!" Then, I complain how we're not communicating.
Isn't that it? They respond, "Well how can I communicate when you won't talk
to me?" And we bark, "Well, you should find a way, because it's all
your fault, anyway!"
Consequently, it's extremely helpful to try a new
way of looking at a situation, and to try a new kind of behavior.
My friend
who teaches conflict management says, sometimes when you feel really stuck in
a problem, do exactly what you don't want to do. He says, sometimes you need to
break that pattern, break that cycle. Do the exact opposite of what you feel like
doing. So, if you're so angry you don't want to talk to the other person, then
maybe the challenge is to go and talk to them. Or, if we're so mad that we want
to talk and never want to listen, then perhaps the thing to do is be quiet and
listen.
Often, it's quite helpful to realize, "Hey, here's my old pattern,
this is how I usually handle it. I've tried that before, and it doesn't work.
How could I think differently? How could I behave differently?" Then we can
develop some creativity with the situation. Play with it. "Well, what would
happen if I did this? What would result if I looked at it this way?" So,
instead of the situation seeming so solid, so concrete, so terrible, we develop
some creativity to handle it in a new way.
Now, someone might say, "But
some situations are so awful, how can we see them in a new way?" Or, "Someone
in my family is dying, and you talk about an opportunity to see problems in a
new way? What do you mean? There's only one possible way for me to behave, and
that is to go crazy! I have to go crazy with grief because this person I love
is dying
there is no alternative!"
This is how we think at times.
We get all wrapped up in our grief, totally bogged down and tied up. But, when
we think there is but one way to handle it, we miss out on everything the situation
has to offer. If it's true someone we love is dying, it may be we can do nothing
to prevent it. That is the reality. But, they have not died yet. And maybe during
the time we still have, we can really communicate. Maybe we can say a lot of the
things we have failed to say to each other before. Perhaps we can share something
very deep and meaningful. As long as there is life, there is still a lot of potential
and richness in how you can relate, and what you can share with another.
Thus,
it is significant to stop and question ourselves, to see the potential in situations,
and get away from locking ourselves into the belief that there is but one way
to feel, one way to act. There is always a choice. The thing is, you know, do
we take this choice?
Think about how to apply these approaches to problems
in your own life. Because if you do this, then the Dharma will become really tasty,
very meaningful. But if you simply listen to the Dharma and think of it abstractly
"Oh, she's talking about problems 'out there'; other people's problems,"
then, you never taste it. We must look at the Dharma in terms of our own life;
bringing it to bear on our own actions.
There are situations where we have
a problem, and, perhaps, we blame ourselves. We are very good at that, too, aren't
we? We can really get into that one
"It's all my fault. Something is
wrong with me. I'm terrible. I'm this awful person! Look at me! Oh, nobody can
love me. I'm horrible. I did it again!"
It's called the "Beat-myself-up"
syndrome. And we do it very, very well. Very well. But this is that same faulty
way of thinking, that when there's a problem it comes only from one cause. It's
like blaming the other person, but in this case the 'other person' is yourself.
It's the same narrow way of thinking. Except, it's fascinating, in that it's really
a way of making ourselves extremely important. "The whole thing collapsed
because of me. I'm such an idiot; I'm so incompetent, I make the entire project
a disaster." Or, "The whole family is in turmoil, all because of me."
We're very important, then, aren't we? Extremely important. So it's very curious
how, when we get into this performance of blaming ourselves, and feeling guilty,
and self-hatred. It's actually a rather contorted way our self-cherishing mind
has of making us extremely important.
It's so strange. I find we often fail
to do things that are our responsibility, thinking they are someone else's responsibility.
And things that are not our responsibility, we accept responsibility for, and
blame ourselves. It's very, very interesting. Very curious. And, I think, parents
do this a lot.
When your child has a problem, you think, "It's my fault.
I should protect my child from every single problem in this universe. " Parents
love their children. Their children are helpless. So, it's, "I should protect
my child from every problem." The kid is 25 years old, and he stubs his toe
- "It's my fault!" Or, my boy's 35 and fighting with his colleague -
"It's my fault." We blame ourselves for all sorts of things that are
not our fault at all. They're someone else's responsibility.
This is quite
thought-provoking. I think we need to go back and do a lot of meditation on this,
reflecting on what it means to be responsible, and what things are our responsibility,
and what are not? And, when things are my responsibility, am I the only person
playing a role in this, or does it have something to do with another person? This
concept of blaming ourselves is very lop-sided. We are not the only one making
this whole world go wrong. There are other factors in the situation.
Now sometimes,
it's true, people have had a negative experience in the past, and we do something
similar to what occurred to them before. So they get really, really defensive.
We can't understand why. So it's often wise just to cool down, and recognize you
need not take this so personally. This person isn't really attacking you. They
are attacking the past experience. That isn't your responsibility. You are only
responsible for what you said, or did, to trigger the problem. If their reaction
is way out of proportion, if they are unhappy and something else is going on with
them, then maybe you need to ask some questions. Give them a chance to express
themselves. Help them discover what's really at the root of the situation, and
what is really bugging them.
I have had that happen to me. Once I did something,
not intending to start a conflict, and this other person was so angry they told
me off for, like, 45 minutes over the phone. I mean, I'm glad they were paying
for it. No
it's a local call. Maybe that's why it lasted so long? If it
was long distance, maybe they wouldn't have talked that long?
Anyway, they
totally dumped on me. It was incredible, and over this small thing. But, seeing
this person's reaction was well out of proportion to what was going on, I just
kind of sat there, listening. I didn't need to take it personally. Something was
going on with this person and they really needed to unload. And now, when I see
this person, everything is fine. There was no residual hangover from that conflict.
Perhaps we might see somebody doing something negative, say, catching fish,
or something like that. How can we convince them? Well, frequently we aren't in
a position to convince them. Sometimes it's better to say nothing. As long as
sentient beings have a garbage mind, they are going to kill. I mean, when you
get angry, is it the lama's fault he can't control your mind?
When you get
angry, if someone comes along and says, "Jangchub, don't get angry,"
do you say, "Oh yes, I'll listen to you. You're right."? No. You say,
"No, I'm angry for a reason! You be quiet!" Look at us. Other people
offer us advice. We don't listen, do we? Not very carefully.
But sometimes
when somebody's doing something negative, we can want to intervene out of compassion.
And sometimes we want to intervene out of a sense of being self-righteous. These
are two very different motivations. We really must distinguish between the two.
It's very easy, when we're self-righteous, to think we're being compassionate.
But we aren't compassionate, we're all puffed up with ourselves. Then it's, "I
know good ethics. I know good karma. You're doing it wrong! You should listen
to me because I'm morally superior. I know more about Dharma. You should listen
to me and follow my example!"
We don't actually say it like that, because
we would look bad. But that is what we're thinking. We're being very proud and
self-righteous. We're not helping anyone. We're just acting out of our own garbage
mind.
That's very different than seeing somebody doing something negative,
and having true compassion for them, as well as for whoever they're harming -
two completely different motivations, even though the action may seem the same.
We must look beyond the action and at the motivation.
In the place I live
in the States, there is a lake nearby. I sometimes walk around, and I'll see people
fishing. When I see them pull up a fish, it's very painful for me. I want to go
to that person and say, "Please, put the fish back and don't do this."
But, I know that's not a skilful way to handle the situation. They're not going
to listen. They're more likely to get angry and probably think negatively of me
and about Buddhism. And they're still going to kill the fish.
I'm not the right
person in that situation to help them, and it's not a situation where I can really
help.
I can do nothing directly, so in my heart I make prayers. When I see
the fishermen out there, I pray they don't catch any fish. I do! I don't tell
them I'm praying this. And, when they do catch a fish, I do the taking and giving
meditation. I really pray, "Can this person in some future time meet the
Dharma and begin to see the error in what they are doing, and correct it."
But, you see, it's significant, when we see people doing negative things,
occasionally we are the right person and it's the right situation, and we can
intervene. And sometimes we should not.
It's also important to remember to
check our own behavior; look at our own mind, checking our motivation, ensuring
we are acting out of a true heart of kindness.
Now let's consider someone who's
blaming themselves for having done something wrong. Again, what we can do depends
on the situation and our relationship with that person. Sometimes the best we
can do is to listen to them. Let them talk. Help them by asking questions. Help
them realize all the responsibility does not fall on their shoulders.
Sometimes
that's not the best way to handle it. Sometimes if the person feels very bad for
having done something, then it's helpful to encourage them to do some purification
practice. Then, either teach them some purification practice or introduce them
to a teacher who can. So, it depends much on the situation.
Question &
Answer Session
Q: Can the masters take away the bad karma of their disciples?
If
they could, they would have already. Isn't it true? The Buddha is so compassionate,
if the Buddha could have taken away all of our bad karma, the Buddha would have
done it already. Our teachers are very compassionate. If they could take away
our bad karma, they would have done it.
The way our teachers intercede and
help us is by teaching us the Dharma. They can't take away our bad karma, like
washing the dirt off our hands. They can't do that. But they can teach us how
to wash the dirt off our own hands. Our teachers help us to take away our negative
karma by teaching us the Dharma. Then, by practicing the Dharma, we are able to
purify our own mind. No one else can purify our mind for us. We must do that for
ourselves. Nobody can generate realizations on the path for us. We have to do
that for ourselves. But our teachers can help us, and that is why we need teachers.
Q:
How do we apply the notion of emptiness to transforming problems?
It is very
interesting, this potential of applying emptiness to a problem. There are many
ways to do this.
Often when we think, "I have a problem," we think,
"Oh, everything is so heavy! The whole notion of my problem is heavy. My
problem is very concrete. It's very real. It's so real I can almost touch it.
I mean, "This is my problem! It's there!"
It's very helpful at that
point, to ask ourselves, "What is this problem? Where is this problem?"
Because our idea is, "I have this problem," as if it's this real thing,
almost physical. So where is it? Is the problem inside me? Is the problem inside
you? Is it in the space between us? Is the problem the sound waves that are going
back and forth between us? Is the problem my ideas? Your ideas? Where are my ideas?
Where are your ideas? Where is the problem, really?
It's very interesting
when we start analyzing and ask, "What really is a problem; where is this
problem?" All of a sudden this problem that seemed so real, so concrete,
somehow disintegrates a little. We can't find it. It doesn't seem so concrete
anymore, because we can't find where it is. So, that is one way of applying the
idea of emptiness to transforming problems.
And when we have a problem, we
also have a strong sense of "I", don't we? "I hurt. I have a problem."
When we have a problem, the "I", the sense of self is extremely strong.
"This is my problem!"
The self is very real. Anything happening to
the self is much more important than what happens to others. So there's a very
strong sense of a self that is suffering at this point. Then, it's a very interesting
experiment, too, to hold onto that strong sense of self that is being treated
so unjustly, and that is suffering, and with another part of the mind, ask ourselves,
"Who's suffering? Who's the one who has the problem?"
The self with
the problem seemed really solid. So if there were really a solid self with a problem,
we should be able to find that person. "Who is it? Who has the problem? Who
is in pain? Is it my body? Is it my mind? Which thought? Which part of my body?
Which part of my mind?" And again, this seemingly very solid self with a
problem, can't be found. The idea of this tangible self starts to evaporate. This
is another way to apply the meditation on emptiness.
Q: When we have a problem,
it has been said we can pray to our Guru and receive some blessings. Where do
these blessings come from?
So
I have a problem, and I pray, "Lama,
help me!", then my lama comes with a magic wand, waves it, and "Boing!"
Then it's, "Ah
bliss!" Is that what happens?
When I pray, "Lama,
help me!", and I don't get bliss afterwards, does that mean something's wrong
with my lama? He's off duty?
No. When they say "receiving the blessing"
or "receiving the inspiration", what this means is that our mind is
transformed. It's not some real, solid, concrete thing coming from the lama and
going "boing" and we got it, okay? What is very often happening, I think,
is very different, and it depends on how we pray to the Buddha, or to our lamas.
We might pray, "Buddha, please make this problem go away." And,
that is not the right way to pray. We should pray, "Buddha, please help me
to find my inner strength and resources to deal with this problem, and transform
it into the path to enlightenment."
Now, when we transform a problem,
it ceases to be a problem. And we transform it by changing our attitude. So depending
on how we pray, and depending on our attitude when our mind is transformed, that
is called receiving the blessings. Sometimes maybe, some energy from the lama
is happening at that time. But often, because we've previously heard teachings,
when we pray, "Please help me find my internal strengths and resources
,"
this opens our mind to recalling what our lama has taught. And when we remember,
we begin applying them, and our mind gets transformed. But sometimes, unless we
pray properly, we don't remember the teachings, so we don't use them.
You might
need to observe your own mind, and what occurs when you pray, and as a result
of it - and how that helps your mind. Think about what receiving the blessing
means from your own experience.
But receiving the blessing is not something
the lama does - it's not like, "Oh here, have a blessing." Because sometimes
our minds are very fertile and are easily transformed. And sometimes our minds
are like a rock. At times we could sit in front of Shakyamuni Buddha himself,
and if our mind is like a rock, nothing is going in. We're going to be cynical,
bitter, and sarcastic, even sitting in front of Shakyamuni Buddha.
That isn't
the Buddha's fault. Our not receiving the inspiration isn't the Buddha's problem.
It's because our mind is so obscured by negative karma, there is no space. So
we need to do some purification. Purification is very important.
***********************************************************************************************
What
is the role of prayer? Can prayers be answered?
There are many kinds
of prayers. Some are designed to direct our minds toward a certain spiritual quality
or aim, inspiring our mind to work to develop it and thus creating the cause for
us to attain this. An example is praying to be more
tolerant and compassionate
toward others. Other prayers are for specific people or situations, for example
praying for a person's illness to be cured or for that person's mind to be peaceful
and his life meaningful in spite of the illness.
For any prayer to be fulfilled,
prayer alone isn't sufficient. The appropriate causes must also be created. We
can't simply think, "Please, Buddha, make this and that happen. I'll relax
and have tea while you do the work!" For example, if we pray to be more loving
and compassionate and yet make no effort to control our anger, we aren't creating
the cause for that prayer to be fulfilled. The transformation of our minds comes
from our own effort, but we can pray for the Buddhas' inspiration to do so.
Receiving
the blessings of the Buddhas doesn't mean that something tangible comes from the
Buddha and goes into us. It means that our minds are transformed through the combined
effort of the teachings, the guidance of the
Buddhas and bodhisattvas, and
our own practice. "Requesting the Buddhas'blessings" has the connotation
of requesting to be inspired by them so that our minds and actions are transformed
and become more beneficial.
Some Buddhist practitioners seek to be born in
a pure land in their next life because all the conditions there are conducive
for Dharma practice and developing wisdom and compassion are comparatively easy.
But we cannot pray to be born in a pure land and expect the Buddhas and bodhisattvas
to
make it happen! We must also make effort to actualize the teachings by not
selfishly clinging to worldly pleasures and by generating compassion and an understanding
of emptiness. If we do our part, then praying will have a profound effect on our
minds. On the other hand, if we make no attempt to
correct our harmful habits
and if our minds are distracted while we pray, the effect is minimal.
Some
people pray for another's sickness to be cured, for the family finances to improve,
or for a deceased relative to have a good rebirth. For these things to occur,
the other people involved must have created the necessary causes. If they have,
our prayers provide the condition for the seed of constructive actions they did
in the past to ripen into that result. However, if they haven't created the causal
seeds through their own positive past actions, it's difficult for
our prayers
to be fulfilled. We can put fertilizer and water on the ground, but if the farmer
hasn't planted the seed, nothing will grow.
When the Buddha described the working
of cause and effect in our mindstreams, he said that killing causes us to have
short lives or much illness. Abandoning killing and saving the lives of others
causes us to have a long life, free from illness. If we neglect to follow this
basic advice and yet pray for a long
and healthy life, we have missed the point!
On the other hand, if we abandon killing and save lives, prayers can help those
positive seeds to ripen.
In addition, the Buddha said generosity is the cause
of wealth. If we have been generous in a past life and now pray for our wealth
to increase, our finances could improve. Yet, if we are miserly now, we are creating
the cause for poverty,
not wealth, in the future. In this case, no matter how
much we pray to be financially comfortable, our actions are creating the cause
for the opposite result. Instead we need to cultivate generosity helping those
in need and sharing what we have.
***********************************************************************************************
The
Wheel of Sharp Weapons:
A Mahayana Cleansing of Attitudes
(Theg-pa
chen-po'i blo-sbyong mtshon-cha 'khor-lo) by Dharmarakshita
translated by Alexander
Berzin and Sharpa Tulku,
together with Jonathan Landaw and Khamlung Tulku,
based
on an oral explanation by Geshe Ngawang Dhargyey, 1973
Reprint edition,
with commentary by Geshe Ngawang Dhargyey, published as:
Dharmarakshita. The
Wheel of Sharp Weapons. Dharamsala, India: Library of Tibetan Works & Archives,
1981.
The name of this work is The Wheel of Sharp Weapons Effectively
Striking the Heart of the Foe.
I pay heartfelt homage to you, Yamantaka;
Your
wrath is opposed to the Great Lord of Death.[1]
(1) In jungles of
poisonous plants strut the peacocks,
Though medicine gardens of beauty lie
near.
The masses of peacocks don't find gardens pleasant,
But thrive on
the essence of poisonous plants.
(2) In similar fashion, [2] the
brave bodhisattvas
Remain in the jungle of worldly concern.
No matter how
joyful this world's pleasure gardens,
These brave ones are never attracted
to pleasures,
But thrive in the jungle of suffering and pain.
(3) We spend
our whole lives in the search for enjoyment,
Yet tremble with fear at the mere
thought of pain;
Thus since we are cowards, we are miserable still.
But
the brave bodhisattvas accept suffering gladly
And gain from their courage
a true lasting joy.
(4) Now, [3] desire is the jungle of poisonous plants here.[4]
Only
brave ones, like peacocks, can thrive on such fare.
If cowardly beings, like
crows, were to try it,
Because they are greedy, they might lose their lives.[5]
(5) How can someone who cherishes self more than others
Take lust and such
dangerous poisons for food?
If he tried like a crow to use other delusions,
[6]
He would probably forfeit his chance for release.
(6) And thus bodhisattvas
are likened to peacocks:
They live on delusions - those poisonous plants.
Transforming
them into the essence of practice,
They thrive in the jungle of everyday life.
Whatever
is presented, they always accept,
While destroying the poison of clinging desire.
(7)
Uncontrollable wandering through rounds of existence
Is caused by our grasping
at egos as real.
This ignorant attitude heralds the demon
Of selfish concern
for our welfare alone:
We seek some security for our own egos;
We want only
pleasure and shun any pain.
But now, we must banish all selfish compulsion
And
gladly take hardship for all others' sake.
(8) All of our sufferings derive
from our habits
Of selfish delusions we heed and act out.
As all of us share
in this tragic misfortune,
Which stems from our narrow and self-centered ways,
We
must take all our sufferings and the miseries of others
And smother our wishes
of selfish concern.
(9) Should the impulse arise now to seek our own pleasure,
We
must turn it aside to please others instead;
For even if loved ones should
rise up against us,
We must blame our self-interest and feel it's our due.
(10)
When our bodies are aching and racked with great torment
Of dreadful diseases
we cannot endure,
This is the wheel of sharp weapons returning
Full circle
upon us from wrongs we have done.
Till now we have injured the bodies of others;
Hereafter
let's take on what sickness is theirs.
(11) Depressed and forlorn, when we
feel mental anguish,
This is the wheel of sharp weapons returning
Full
circle upon us from wrongs we have done.
Till now we have deeply disturbed
minds of others;
Hereafter let's take on this suffering ourselves.
(12)
When hunger or violent thirst overwhelms us,
This is the wheel of sharp weapons
returning
Full circle upon us from wrongs we have done.
Till now we have
kept what we had without sharing;
We have plundered and stolen and lured people
on.
Hereafter let's take from them hunger and thirst.
(13) When we lack
any freedom, but must obey others,
This is the wheel of sharp weapons returning
Full circle upon us from wrongs we have done.
Till now we have looked down
on those who were lowly
And used them as servants for our own selfish needs;
Hereafter
let's offer our service to others
With humble devotion of body and life.
(14)
When we hear only language that is foul and abusive,
This is the wheel of sharp
weapons returning
Full circle upon us from wrongs we have done.
Till now
we have said many things without thinking;
We have slandered and caused many
friendships to end.
Hereafter let's censure all thoughtless remarks.
(15)
When we are born in oppressive and wretched conditions,
This is the wheel of
sharp weapons returning
Full circle upon us from wrongs we have done.
Till
now we have always had negative outlooks;
We have criticized others, seeing
only their flaws.
Hereafter let's cultivate positive feelings
And view our
surroundings as stainless and pure.
(16) When we are parted from friends and
from those who can help us,
This is the wheel of sharp weapons returning
Full
circle upon us from wrongs we have done.
Till now we have taken the friends
and good servants
Of others away, wanting them for ourselves;
Hereafter
let's never cause close friends to part.
(17) When supreme holy gurus find
us displeasing,
This is the wheel of sharp weapons returning
Full circle
upon us from wrongs we have done.
Till now we have turned from the gurus and
teachings,
Preferring the counsel of misleading friends;
Hereafter let's
end our dependent relations
With those who would turn us away from the path.
(18)
When unjustly we are blamed for the misdeeds of others,
And are falsely accused
of flaws that we lack,
And are always the object of verbal abuse,
This
is the wheel of sharp weapons returning
Full circle upon us from wrongs we
have done.
Till now we've despised and belittled our gurus;
Hereafter let's
never accuse others falsely,
But give them full credit for virtues they have.
(19)
When the things we require for daily consumption
And use, fall apart or are
wasted or spoilt,
This is the wheel of sharp weapons returning
Full circle
upon us from wrongs we have done.
Till now we've been careless with others'
possessions;
Hereafter let's give them whatever they need.
(20) When our
minds are unclear and our hearts are unhappy,
We are bored doing virtue but
excited by vice,
This is the wheel of sharp weapons returning
Full circle
upon us from wrongs w